UN & The Fake Limits To Growth

NWO and wars deceive you into compliance

Sep 24, 2024

Powers that be talk of an interconnected world by blocking the very same thing
Britain and City of London obstructed plans to develop the world for 150 years
Arrested development as vested interests profit from keeping people in poverty
Game of isolating Russia is centuries old, from India, China, Germany and U.S.
Why is the Arctic not being developed... or rather, who is obstructing it?
Britain went to war over Germany’s Baghdad railroad, and the one from China

Related:
Part 1: UN Seeks Control Of Nations - Bloated, ageing functionaries offer their Pact for the Future (Sep 22, 2024)
Part 2: Russia Rejects UN Pact For The Future - Communitarian dialectic continues to exploit 'false binary' (Sep 23, 2024)
Part 3: UN & The Fake Limits To Growth - NWO and wars deceive you into compliance (Sep 24, 2024]
See also:
The Great Replacement Of Everything - Dollar, Western civilisation sidelined: what gives? (Jul 21, 2024)

(2,200 words or 11 minutes of your company)

Blinkered horizons: Alaska - the route of the possible Russia-U.S. railway

Sep 24, 2024

“They're all complicit in one-world government,” is a tautology — all governments are involved with each other, and ripping off each other's technology.

But it misses the bigger confidence trick that artistes are playing on We The People. That's why I call it a statement of the obvious.

The key question is what precisely is being lied about.

I am not a philosopher or a psychologist (I am a trained historian and journalist, financial and international) but it seems to me there two main kinds of deception: the deceiver or gas-lighter who imposes a false narrative, and the confidence trickster who disguises an object's true worth!

One seeks to manipulate your behaviour, the other to deprive you of value. To deny this, to force that: in other words, a snake oil salesman.

Psychological and economic deprivation of the population — didn't we witness that during the Covid response?

What these powers want is stasis, a closed system: for they cannot have humanity reaching a new level of cooperation.

If, however, we cooperate, grow more wealth and raise up a people in our glorious multitudes we show that we do not need kings nor the cabbages that pass for them.

Fake limits to growth

Imagine if we had land, energy and possibilities much greater than we are being told?

It is not by accident that the key document behind the environmental movement is the Rockefeller-funded Club of Rome's The Limits To Growth (1972).

In its sequel The First Global Revolution (Council of the Club of Rome, 1991) they admitted that they needed a cover story that would remove opposition to their objectives:

"In searching for a common enemy against whom we can unite, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like, would fit the bill… All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy then is humanity itself.”

There are many strategies to corner a market by deluding the masses: gas lighting and fraud by combines and cartels that control resources, monopolies and false shortages.

Rip-off is the main strategy behind the NWO, great reset or one world government. Cheating the customer through false scarcity — like the UN plan for rationing food and energy under Net Zero.

You cannot push the People into a bad deal — and the Great Reset is a very bad deal — without lying to them, beating them and selling them a false bill of goods.

And that is precisely what the evidence of Covid shows: government and media lied; police beat protesters against lockdowns and mandates; and the "safe and effective" did not do what it said because the label was blank. Google and the Fakt Cheka lie about this to this day.

So whether Russia is "in on it" is almost irrelevant to what is going on.

Off_Target

We get angry when Google Maps sends us to a destination by a long route instead of the shorter one. What if the syndicates who control money, resources and increasingly governments, are sending us by a longer route, and fleecing us of money, energy, happiness and lifespan on the way?

Factual example. We are told that China's proposal for railways, ports and assembly plants stretching from East to West is something new. The United States and Russia discussed something similar in the 1850s — even before the Crimean War of 1853-6.

Why did Russia sell Alaska to the United States for $7 million dollars? This is barely known today, and few can make sense of it.

Empire days

The British triangular trade was multipolar and made it rich, yet today the British are impoverished by a bilateral relationship with the U.S.

The British empire was essentially a global shop window for the City of London. It was more complex than that, because they had to get the cotton, tea, opium, gold and diamonds from the colonies at rock bottom price, and then force people to buy them even if they didn't want them (the Opium Wars were used to break open China and sell them drugs).

The supply chain is the key determinant of price and margin, or the profit to the owner investor. If your rival can get minerals to the factory, or reach the customer more cheaply, the ruthless will sabotage competitors.

If another country could build an overland route from India to Europe that beat your ships, or a railway from Baghdad's oilfields to Berlin, he would gain an advantage — and you'd try to stop him.

If he built a gas pipeline from Russia to Germany you might blow it up.

And if he built a railway from Russia, all the way through Alaska, to the United States — do you think the British might be jealous enough to stop it?

The gap between Russia and Alaska at the Bering Strait is about 50 miles (80 km). Plans to build a railway, tunnels or a U.S.-Russia bridge go back more than a century.

And yet it transpires that Britain is — to this very day — not only fearful of Russia combining with Germany into an economic powerhouse but also of Russia and the United States!

Straight up, credit to Matthew Ehret for bringing the Arctic issue to my attention, and to Sarah Westall for interviewing him. [1]

Russia had played a role in America since the revolutionary war. The Tsar refused to help Britain suppress the colonies. During the civil war Russia's navy protected the ports on each sea, pledging to defend the Union. In 1867 Russia sold Alaska, with an eye to the U.S. extending its economic power over the continent instead of being constrained by the "British monarchy of the north."

This is no ancient history. President Vladimir Putin has suggested a rail corridor through the Bering Strait. President Donald Trump proposed a more limited line, the Alaska-Alberta rail link.

What Britain proposes is a new defence doctrine of the Canadian arctic missile shield.

Moar war!

Last week Russia said it stands fully ready to defend its interests in the Arctic region, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said in an interview for a documentary series on icebreakers titled “Soviet Breakthrough.”

"We see NATO stepping up drills related to possible crises in the Arctic. Our country is fully ready to defend its interests militarily, politically and from the standpoint of defense technologies."

Lavrov also noted that many non-Arctic countries are interested in projects in the region, “including our strategic partners, China and India.”

Housekeeping

By the way, if you need convincing of the power grab and resource heist, read parts One and Two. See my series on Depopulation, Rivals for Power, the Great Reset is Complete, and the Post-War Order or the Fourth Reich.

Follow The Consensus To Your Demise — A series on depopulation (Aug 9, 2023)
Rivals For Power, Part 1: Guildsmen Trap Us in the Middle Ages (Jul 06, 2021)
Occult Capitalism Or Last Exit To Utopia - The Great Reset: a prelude (Nov 02, 2021)
Nazi Bargain And The Post-War Order - Revival of the fascist project? (Oct 27, 2021)
Bankers Prance To War And Slavery - 'If there must be trouble' (Dec 04, 2021)
Great Replacement Of Everything - Dollar, Western civilisation sidelined (Jul 21, 2024)
Globalism, Socialism, Fascism, Feudalism (Pt 1) - Is globalism dead? (Sep 19, 2022)

Share Moneycircus

The Atlantic Bridge, or Atlantik-Brücke, was the proposal of Eric Warburg, interrogation officer and banker, according to his daughter Marie, in Remarks On My Father Eric M. Warburg.

A skeptic might say the Atlantic Bridge is a misnomer — simply a means to rule out the other bridges that benefit humanity rather than a narrow interest of weapons manufacturers and banks. Contrast that with the genuinely practical proposal of an Arctic bridge.

Here we get into mind wars and word games. He was asked by U.S. high commissioner for Germany John J. McCloy to decide which German industries should be "spared from demolition." [2]

This would continue the British containment of Russia (then the Soviet Union) while using Germany as a strategic ally only for this purpose. It would be the stated policy of NATO as per its first head Hastings Ismay, to keep "America in, Germany down and Russia out."

They treat the people likewise. Depending on your cohort you are in, down or out. This is now NATO's policy as the latest defence reviews declare the domestic population a potential enemy.

See Why Public Is Enemy #1 - Rant in an age of narrative (Jan 31, 2023)

Putin and Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation continue to pursue a Far East Development Plan

The great game of isolating Russia is around 200 years old, since Britain tried to deprive it of its warm water port in Sebastopol with the Crimean war in 1853, and again with the coup in Kyiv in 2014.

Follow the money: it was to stop Russia as a rival route for Indian goods then, and disrupting China's Belt and Road Initiative now.

A great video by Matt Ehret describes the history of Alaska and there are revived development plans from Calgary University. [3]

They wouldn't do that, would they?

Consider if the UN executive power grab and the war with Russia are linked.

The war in Ukraine served to divide the west and east of Europe, just as it was about to integrate with China's New Silk Road project, launched 10 years ago, which sent trains from China, through Russia to Germany.

Transport that competed with the established shippers of the owner-investors was halted in its tracks, as Germany politician Rainer Rothfuss says. [4]

Russia rejected the UN Pact for the Future as interference in domestic jurisdiction. European leaders talk openly of breaking up Russia, one of the last European nations with a stubborn nationalist and religious streak. Could it be an obstacle to one world government?

Is the UN power grab itself based on fake crises?

If the geopolitics is fake because they're "in this together" — some say nukes aren’t real, even wars aren't real — why can't we consider that the crises of climate, zoonotic pandemics, fossil fuels are fear-based manipulation to make us comply with vested interests?

What if they defunded the railways while telling you to buy cars. Then said you should not have cars that travel long distances, imposed fines per mile, and created 15 minute cities?

Wouldn't they do that — you sure?

Pod to pod

Picture this: the expanse of Alaska. And then contrast a short life from eco pod to death pod.

Not amid the country wilds — because the UN will deny you nature, see the UN proposal Managed Retreat, the "coordinated movement of people and buildings away from risks" (Wikipedia) ie away from Nature — so in a back alley.

The people's primeval adventurer is emasculated, denied nature and the jungle — all is replaced by a fragmentary narrative, scattered folk memories — pathways closed off unless it is Britain's Liverpool Pathway, a euphemism for the way that hospitals accelerate death.

By deception, war

One-world government, the new world order or the Great Reset: it hides under many stones.

One Health is likewise a deception for it refers to all life on the planet — yet has less to do with vaccinations than the Biodiversity Convention of 1992, which is a plan to track, manipulate and patent all DNA.

See WHO Passes Pandemic Treaty By Stealth - This is not just a power grab, it is a people grab (Jun 04, 2024)

Like the Net Zero or Carbon Credit agenda, it is about owning the underlying asset — in the case of One Health, all flora and fauna, human and livestock; in the case of Net Zero, carbon taxes that would put a lien on resources and natural habitat.

In the case of UNDRIP, the United Nations Declaration on the. Rights of Indigenous Peoples, the deception is to place first nations into unelected assemblies, outside the protections of the constitution.

See Europe's Parallel Reality: C02 & Degrowth - Carbon is the new coloniser (May 09, 2024)
Dash For Land As Financiers Go To Ground - Colombia conference targets globalist grabs (Mar 16, 2024)

The energy deception was built on deceptions like calling oil a fossil fuel, and demonising nuclear with the Three Mile Island nuclear plant. It’s near meltdown was used to promote the anti-nuclear movement.

Last week Microsoft and nuclear plant owner Constellation agreed to a massive deal to restart the closed Three Mile Island by 2028 to power its datacenters.

The plant had been closed less than two weeks after a film, China Syndrome, (1979) predicted almost the exact same meltdown scenario.

People, we are being played.

Moneycircus