WHO Passes Pandemic Treaty By Stealth

This is not just a power grab, it is a people grab

• Makes it easier to declare a pandemic and imposes a much tougher response

• Increasing the risk of another Covid with harsher mandates and lockdowns

• This is not about health and safety; the objective is social engineering

• Pandemic does not require deaths or statistics, just a finding of ‘risk’

• Creates national units to ‘sniff’ for virus variants

• U.S. continues to create pathogens in dual-use research

• Beware the language of equity and solidarity – codes for totalitarianism

• Youth had better wake up, as they’re going to live under it

• Nations must take the initiative and pass legislation to reject the IHR

See also:
Evil Has Its Day - So shall justice (Aug 20, 2021)
The Never Normal is Forever - UK Gov aims to Embed Control through 'New Identities' (Sep 07, 2021)
Shanghaied And Locked Down - A naval analogy shows where we are headed - one-way if we don't stop it (May 07, 2022)
Hate And Depopulate - Racial eugenics is the parent of population control and climate alarmism (Aug 24, 2022)
Gurus Or Goons: Assessing The Theatre Of Davos - A dip into the duplicitous dell wherein corporate journalists do as they're told (Jan 25, 2023)

(2,100 words or 11 minutes of your life.)

World Health Assembly delegates erupt in stage managed joy

Jun 4, 2024

The World Health Organisation just made it easier to declare a pandemic – but imposed a much tougher response.

Imagine if the police halved the speed limit and raised the fine 1000 per cent.

These are the biggest changes to WHO rules in 20 years — it’s a bigger deal than Covid because it promises more of the same.

There was rejoicing last week when the WHO failed to pass a pandemic treaty but it turns out that sneaky WHO Director General Tedros Ghebreyesus and his boss Bill Gates just changed the International Health Regulations (IHR) instead.

The key words are the “high risk” of a pandemic that “may” fill hospitals, disrupt travel etc. Governments must now respond with a “whole-of-society approach” — which changes everything.

Essential liberties, moral values, judicial principles and ethical norms may be suspended. At best they survive at the whim of corporations, billionaire philanthropists, NGO charities and governments — entities that claim to run society even as they profit from it.

They call themselves stakeholders in a public-private partnership (PPP). They say they will respect our rights under their guidelines of Diversity, Equity and Inclusion.

If you look at DEI, however, it’s not about liberties or principles. When politicians talk about equity and solidarity it should trigger alarm bells.

Young people better wake up because you are going to have to live under this.

Health hustlers

If governments adopt regulations, but cannot or will not explain what they are — except that they’re inclusive and sustainable — run for the hills.

Governments are not telling you what passed. The U.S. State Department hides behind words like “enhance transparency and timeliness of information” and “global health security architecture.” [1]

Apurva Chandra, of India’s ministry of health and family welfare, said:

“This is a further step towards equity and the creation of an umbrella of solidarity that will help protect the world from future pandemic threats. This is a gift to our children and grandchildren.”

The extent of the power grab, by undemocratic methods, means nations must pass legislation to reject the IHR and, better still, leave the WHO.

If you think that’s an exaggeration, Dr Silvia Behrendt, director of the Global Health Responsibility Agency of Salzburg noted in Feb 2023 there had been little public or legal academic discussion of these extensive amendments and the pandemic treaty:

“This is despite the fact that the outcomes of these processes have the potential to affect the livelihoods, lives, health and human rights of individuals around the world, inter alia because amendments proposed will, if adopted, give unique ‘emergency’ powers to the WHO and in particular its Director-General (DG), thereby entrenching the securitised approaches to managing infectious disease outbreaks embodied in the so-called Global Health Security (GHS) doctrine that has dominated the WHO-led global response to Covid-19 into international health law.”

Thankfully James Roguski has tracked the WHO’s manoeuvring. He said yesterday that although we have suffered a defeat, “We now know exactly what we’re dealing with.”

Snake oilers

Unlike the proposed pandemic treaty that will requires two-thirds approval, the IHR as an amendment required only half, and it passed by consensus where no objection was raised.

After its passing Tedros congratulated delegates and they cheered him back like he was the dear leader of North Korea. It is a social environment in which many delegates would doubtless have been under pressure to go along with the majority.

The changes were debated, partly in secret closed sessions — strange for an intergovernmental institution debating its “gift to our children.”

We’ll take a look at the most dangerous amendments and what they tell us about the profit-driven motives of the planners; and why ordinary people still cannot come to terms with what’s being done to them.