Russia Rejects UN Pact For The Future

Communitarian dialectic continues to exploit 'false binary'

Sep 23, 2024

Russia rejects UN Pact for the Future over interference in domestic jurisdiction
What does this say about the NWO - are they really all ‘in this together’?
Stop picking sides: it enables the dialectic in a fake debate that you will lose
UN grabs more power after it failed in its job of stopping war
Niki Raapana called Communitarianism a parasite philosophy that absorbs all
There are ways to rescue and lift each other out of this madness

Second of three articles: We began with the UN's Pact of the Future and the power grab by the United Nations and the World Health Organisation to lord it over nations; now the technique of manipulation that is Communitarianism; and then the false geographical boundaries that hide plentiful resources.

(2,000 words or about 10 minutes of your company)

People divided, sentiment misdirected, so that Communitarians can bring the love

Sep 23, 2024

In this together? Then stop picking sides: it only enables the dialectic in a fake debate that you will lose.

False dialectic number one: Russia is on board with plan for a new world order (as per presidents George H.W. Bush, Joe Biden, British prime minister Gordon Brown, appointed this year to the board of the Rockefeller Foundation) — a one-world government.

So why did it just reject the UN power grab, Pact for the Future, that gives the secretary-general authority to declare emergencies and tell nations how to respond?

Some say it’s a bluff to disguise that Russia is part of the Gates-Rockefeller… Just as they shrug off the threat of nuclear war. Geopolitics doesn’t exist, war isn’t real, nukes aren’t real… etc, etc.

And so continues sophistry, even in the Alt media.

The Guardian says Russia tried to "derail and ambitious plan to revive the UN — and failed." Now Russia will try to amend the pact on those points of domestic jurisdiction in which the UN should not seek to intervene.

"Russia objected to 25 provisions in the draft pact, including asserting the primacy of national jurisdiction and rejecting language on universal access to sexual and reproductive health rights, as well as gender empowerment more broadly." [1]

The “great game” of excluding Russia is at least 200 years old. The British empire tried to stop a rival route for Indian goods. In our next article we shall look at the Arctic route — which the same interests obstruct to this day.

So we may ask the purpose of the current war with Russia. As curious people we are not satisfied with history beginning in February 2022, or even the coup of 2014.

Could it be that a European nation with a stubborn nationalist and religious streak would be an obstacle to one world government?

See the latest comments from Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov. [2]

I don’t know! It’s not me that is hell bent on trolling you that Russia and the U.S. and the Rockefeller-Davos nexus are "in this together." I think I would look first at the two chuckle brothers above!

Former British prime minister Tony Blair claims, like the World Economic Forum’s Klaus Schwab, that an industrial revolution is driving social change — when it is a wealth grab that hogs the profits from technological advance.

In economics class in the 1970s the problem the teacher posed was what workers would do with their spare time once we worked 15-hour weeks. Instead we are offered 15-minute cities.

Ernst Schumacher had just published Small Is Beautiful (1973). Such was the influence of the book it was taken for granted that the economy should serve the needs of human development, education and the local, from the village up.

See The Arc Of Yuval Noah Harari - And his covenant with Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum (Apr 28, 2022)

Relaunching the Reset

The top document or agenda, around which power is to be centralised, include the Sustainable Development Goals. None is on track to be achieved by the UN's stated deadline of 2030 — and the Pact for the Future is an attempt to double down.

I urge you to look at them, for unlike the self-evident truth of a Bill of Rights, the 17 SDGs are vague, immeasurable and anything but absolute. They are also vague in their origin. Most closely they resemble Communitarianism.

This “philosophy” requires that absolute values be undermined through a dialectical process — dismissing bodily integrity, property and privacy, for example by an appeal to the greater good, mother Earth or Nature.

The person who did most to expose Agenda 21 or 2030 as a Communitarian project is the late Niki Raapana (1956-2022).

The Alaskan author of Our Common Destiny and The Anti Communitarian Manifesto (2020), identified the land grabs behind the twisted language used by the UN Agenda.

Words like community and sustainable do not mean the same to all. Investigating the verbiage took her to the father of Communitarianism Amitai Etzioni, a guru to politicians like Blair and his German contemporary Gerhard Schroeder.

Etzioni grew up in Palestine under the British mandate which he attacked in the Palmach. He fought against the Arabs before studying Kabbalah under Martin Buber and moving to the United States. [3]

Communitarianism relies on dialectical reasoning so people accept change by making everything relative. If each argument raises further opposites, demanding resolution, it leads to a new proposition, demanding another thesis — but who in this philosophical realm decides what is truth?

See Übermensch or Lawgiver: Who Rules Among Us? - And why there is only one party (Aug 14, 2021)

As a philosophy which co-opts everything, it rarely faces opposition. For example you won't find the Declaration of Independence or the Bill of Rights because these draw fixed boundaries and deal in absolutes.

Along comes theory, sophistry and quibbles... "there is some truth to those rights but there are errors; sometimes you'll have to give up those rights for the greater good."

Had Etzioni never left Israel, the United Nations was already imbued with relativist thinking by Julian Huxley, founder of UNESCO, and the works of Alice Bailey of the Lucifer (later, Lucis) Trust.

Long before this the Enlightenment had destabilised the principles and ethos of government by creating a gulf between rulers and ruled, not least in the scope of education in the Brahmin or Mandarin class and the masses.

The elite of the Enlightenment worked hard to kick away the ladders and keep the populace in their place. Despite the public perception, there was no one-way road to reason, writes David Riggs in The World of Christopher Marlowe (2004)

Before the Reformation, cathedral schools were an avenue of social mobility for poor boys. Cardinal Wolsey, who became the second richest man in England while in the service of King Henry VIII, was the son of a butcher. After the Reformation, however, the interests of the Church of England merged with those of the hierarchical nation state. The dissenting commissioners told Archbishop Cranmer that ‘it was meet [fitting] for the ploughman’s son to go to plough, and the artificer’s son to apply the trade of his parent’s vocation,’ while ‘gentleman’s children are meet to have the knowledge of government and rule in the commonwealth.’

Even at university level "the study of humanities was a feature of liberal education before the splintering effect of specialization destroyed the vision of the unity of all knowledge" (Thoughts on University Education, by Sunderrao Ramrao Dongerkery).

See Occult Capitalism Or Last Exit To Utopia - The Great Reset: a prelude (Nov 02, 2021)

This is the very real binary that is disguised by the reds and the blues, for which you vote, while playing into the hands of the Brahmins and Mandarins. The British version of the latter are the Fabian society, financed by liberal capitalists, in the shape of the Cecil and Rothschild families and their factotum Alfred, Lord Milner. But they financed the other sides, too, such as the Fabians and the Focus, a “think tank” that advised Winston Churchill.

See Churchill’s Wars And Financial Ties - If you stay close, you win the cigar (May 18, 2023)

Cult of information

Raapana said that Communitarianism was a form of corrupted philosophy.

Historian Theodore Roszak said something related in his book The Cult Of Information (1994) versus knowledge and wisdom.

The reduction of everything to the observable and rational is an error of ideology, in its original meaning as the philosophy of the mind which derives knowledge from the senses, as opposed to metaphysics. Similarly knowledge of the “unknown unknowns” has always been a question, religious, spiritual or of the mystery of consciousness. Yet the idea that one can capture the totality of human life within mathematics or computer has come to dominate for more than a century.

See Merge Your Identities - Bring your younger and elder selves together (Aug 05, 2021)

Roszak recognized decades ago the tendency of each age to see creation through the eyes of its own technology. This was the conceit of the clock — Enlightenment thinkers saw the universe as a timepiece and, if they believed in God, he was the great watchmaker in the sky.

Today we compare the body with a computer. Warnings of those such as Roszak are ignored. He deserves to be quoted at length, particularly his observation that the central ideas that underpin our society are based on experience and moral vision, not research or a body of facts.

“At the time the computer was gaining visibility on the social scene in the late 1940s there was a breakthrough in biology: the discovery of DNA... Researchers took the cybernetics information-transfer technology as a model for DNA. We now know that may not be adequate... Out of that came the image of DNA as a bio-computer and all of this lent credibility to DNA as an information processing mechanism. As we know DNA is the secret of life, it was like saying information is the secret of life.
“As of the 1950s the Great Watchmaker became the Great Cosmic Programmer and it became conventional for people to talk of their thinking as being programmed... This is nothing but an image or a paradigm or a model and it might not be adequate.” [4]

The declaration, “All men are created equal,” contains precisely no information. Yet it is one of the crowning declarations of humanity.

See The Arc Of Yuval Noah Harari - And his covenant with Klaus Schwab of the World Economic Forum (Apr 28, 2022)

Stop picking sides

Moreover, we tend to assume that people are well intentioned. Each individual thinks of themselves as basically good, even if we allow ourselves the occasional misdemeanour. But if we all are doing different things, often in conflict with each other, how can all be good?

That is the Achilles' heel, and yet few expose this fallacy because Communitarianism appeals to sentiment. It co-opted the environmental movement, the New Agers and the institutions, from education to local government.

It’s adherents fill “charities” — the non governmental organisations and philanthropies — and through public private partnership they build roads and hospitals. They have hijacked the moral high ground with money.

Chto Delat?

A reader asked what is to be done.

First, we learn as much as possible about the enemy and their project. Confront it in real time, not by rehashing the founding of the Federal Reserve, Nine-Eleven or even where Covid came from. A news story should begin in the present.

Have confidence in your integrity and rights, inalienable and indivisible. Above all, stop picking sides: for that enables the dialectic in a fake debate that you will lose.

Each of us is part of the information war, which manipulates what we know, without our knowing it.

Whether we watch BBC or NBC, or Tucker Carlson or Glenn Greenwald's System Update, narrative drives us.

Warmongers plan to create the conditions for our consent to nuclear war — instead of the development of humanity.

See how they run

Niki Raapana called Communitarianism a parasite philosophy which absorbs everything that is already in existence, and also seeks to combine religions.

It is a moral weakness, which is why it spreads by identifying fellows with the same character flaws — those who speak the language of forced behaviours by which they repress others to gain wealth and power.

Don't just think; act.

Reject and denounce sophistry, dialectical weasel words that undermines absolutes in pursuit of power. Yes, recent generations grew up with postmodern sophistry: we must disabuse them, too.

They won't acknowledge their relativism, their identity politics and political correctness — and neither shall we!

This includes those parts of the media who can't say the words reset or globalist — perhaps they harbour a secret sympathy for the project. We saw this during Covid when much of the commentariat loved lockdowns. They would not challenge the Covid narrative because the Covid response tickled their totalitarian tendencies.

Lately these lockdown lovers have snuck out of the woodwork to present
themselves as the "dream teams" of alternative influencers. It may be safer to seek validation in numbers, but it is sweeter to be lifted out of delusion and restored to absolute values.

Be wary of those who seek to dominate discourse: the power that can defeat globalism is non-compliant individualism.

Discussion about this post

Terry Wears

Sep 23

Very insightful , many thanks. Such a powerful stroke of positivity to see Russia pushing back on the UN pact. The multi decade plan of technocracy cannot succeed with Russia and her supporters pushing back.

Expand full comment

rossgopicotrain

Sep 24

'So why did it just reject the UN power grab, Pact for the Future, that gives the secretary-general authority to declare emergencies and tell nations how to respond?' - interesting question; and a pundit that may shed some light vis-a-vis said query is one Riley Waggaman; who through the skeptical eye of his interrogator, Mike Whitney ('globalresearch.ca') had the following to say:

'Russia has a “domestic passport” that basically functions as a national ID. You use your domestic passport to open up a bank account, and for when you have to interact with the local bureaucracy. It’s an important document that you need to do ordinary, everyday things.'

'The digital passport has been billed as an electronic copy of the domestic passport, accessible via smartphone (via the State Services portal, Gosuslugi). The government is still deciding in what situations/scenarios the digital passport will be accepted as a valid form of ID.'

'The fact that this ID will be linked to the State Services portal (Gosuslugi) is certainly cause for concern and it’s easy to imagine how digital passports could be used (and abused) by the Russian government—or any government, for that matter. All in the name of convenience.'

'Of course, the authorities promise that digital IDs will never be made mandatory. Well, I’m old enough to remember when the Russian government promised that Covid vaccination would be 100% voluntary.'

'Excluding the possibility of imposing a full-spectrum digital gulag, the digital ruble has no obvious benefits. I would say the same of all CBDCs, of course.'

'Some claim that the digital ruble is a very necessary, prudent, and brilliant way to bypass Western sanctions. This is untrue. The Bank of Russia has a fully functional Financial Messaging System (SPFS) that operates independently from SWIFT.'

'I’m puzzled as to why so many westerners who claim to understand the dangers of CBDCs think the digital ruble is somehow “different”. The Bank of Russia’s CBDC has been almost unanimously condemned by the country’s most prominent commentators in the alternative/conservative media space. Even mainstream outlets like Tsargrad have published scathing take-downs of the digital ruble.'

'If Russia’s enterprising health ministry—which works tirelessly to safeguard public health—decides that “Covid” is “spreading” at an unacceptable rate, various categories of citizens will have to choose between getting vaxxed or losing their jobs. This is of course still voluntary vaccination because Russians get to choose whether they want to be employed or inject themselves with an unproven genetic goo developed in cooperation with AstraZeneca.'

'The Gamaleya Center continues to “update” its Covid vaccine, and the Russian government continues to shill this dangerous and barely tested trash to children. Whether Covid vaccination will become as ubiquitous and “normal” as the annual flu shot (which is even shoved into the little arms of Russian children every year; I know because I had to sign a document forbidding the kindergarten nurse from injecting my 6-year-old son) is an open question.'

'Is Moscow fighting the western oligarchy in Ukraine? Gazprom has been pumping gas across Ukraine since Day 1 of the Special Military Operation (SMO). And that’s not the only natural resource that Russian “entrepreneurs” are desperately transiting through Ukrainian territory.'

'But to address the second part of your question: Anyone who follows Russian-language media knows that Moscow is in near-total lockstep with the West when it comes to soul-crushing technocracy and other forms “safe and convenient” societal progress. Actually, an objective observer would recognize that Russia is far ahead of the West in implementing “digitalization” shilled by Davos and other celebrated globalist organizations.'

'Putin has done nothing meaningful to slow this process down. Actually, by allowing glorious patriots like Herman Gref to spearhead AI, biometrics, QR-coded cattle-tagging, facial recognition systems, “sustainable development”, and other trendy tech-development in Russia, Putin is an unapologetic accomplice in all the unsavory madness pestering Russia and every other country.'

So, with these facts outlined by Waggaman, it appears that Russia - notwithstanding the aforementioned rejection of the UN power grab, i.e., Pact for the Future, - is on a trajectory that's not too dissimilar than most of the West when it comes to the NWO/Agenda 2030/Digital gulag!

Expand full comment

1 reply by Moneycircus

4 more comments...

No posts