U.S. Missiles To Strike Within Russia

Beware the mental injection: propaganda incoming

• Ukraine cleared by the White House to strike deep in Russia with US systems

• Russia hits Ukraine's electricity substations to cut it off from the European grid

• White House allowed military contractors to deploy in Ukraine on Nov 8

• Is Trump being snared in war or is the uni-war party in control?

• Russia, Iran, China - how many enemies does one need!

• ‘Don't get fooled again… Meet the new boss, Same as the old boss’

Can Trump Resist One World Nirvana? - Decoding the lingo, by any means necessary (Nov 08, 2024)
The 'Fascist' Word And The Real Threat- Rival orders of Woke may combine in a 1930s reboot (Nov 04, 2024)
Just Following Orders: How Media Creates Conformity - Polarization leads people to side with authority (Jan 28, 2024)
Whose Agenda Is The Woke Agenda? - From climate change to vaccine mandates, the greater good spreads its tentacles (Mar 17, 2023)
Mutually Assured Destruction And The Environmental Agenda - Threat of nuclear annihilation makes a timely reappearance (Feb 13, 2023)

( 2,700 words or about 12 minutes of your company.)

Nov 18, 2024

When a president leaves office, he usually pardons a few people. Joe Biden plans to bequeath a war; potentially nuclear.

Sixty three days before Donald Trump is due to take office the globalists are escalating.

Long-range missiles strikes will be used to strike in Kursk Region, which Ukraine invaded in August but where its forces are now trapped. Missiles may be used elsewhere in Russia.

Moscow’s reaction was low key. Foreign ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said president Vladimir Putin had already expressed his view.

Putin warned in September that a Western move to let Kyiv use longer-range weapons against targets inside Russia "would mean that NATO countries, the US, European countries, are at war with Russia.”

“It is not a question of allowing the Ukrainian regime to strike Russia with these weapons or not. It is about deciding whether NATO countries become directly involved in the military conflict or not.”

Let the propaganda begin

Western populations will be propagandised like never before. You are a combatant in political warfare, whether you like it or not. Influencers will try to sway crowds; alternative media sites will spin theoretical arguments like "war does not exist"; the legacy media will continue their dirge of sports, bake-offs and dancing shows.

Your job is to learn how propaganda works and to immunise yourself.

See Just Following Orders: How Media Creates Conformity - Polarization leads people to side with authority (Jan 28, 2024)

Simultaneously, censorship is being ramped up. Australia's government is pushing a MAD Bill (Combating Misinformation and Disinformation Bill 2024)that would empower the eSafety commissioner to censor opinions based on a "fact-checker's" verdict.

When governments cannot tolerate free-spoken truth, you know they're at war with The People.

Is Trump complicit or manipulated? Most likely the political class is less divided than the people. Think about that.

Nine Eleven parallels

Various interests want war. For the military industrial complex nothing matches the profits of war. The Pentagon last week said it could not account for $2.46 trillion. [1]

On September 10, 2001, the defense secretary Donald Rumsfeld said "according to some estimates, we cannot track 2.3 trillion dollars in transactions."

The next day the accounting office of the Pentagon exploded.

Back then we were sold fear of foreigners, mostly Muslim. With the War on Terror, we gave up our liberties and were surveilled as we stood in line for a pat down.

This time we are told to fear our neighbours — one half cheers for Donald Trump; the other half reflexively opposes anything that the president-elect supports.

'War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.'

A poll in March 1940 found that 96 percent of Americans were against going to war with Germany.

They've prepared the ground this time, and polarised the people in advance. What does that tell us — that the enemy is at home?

War brings on many changes

War serves various interests.

The wild-eyed opponents of Trump may think a war could trigger a government of national unity before he takes power.

Back in 2001 the George W Bush administration initiated Continuity of Government (COG) measures (it is not clear if they have ever been lifted). Bush went to war in Iraq and Afghanistan after the demolition of the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001. The vice president at the time, Dick Cheney, backed Kamala Harris in this month's election.

The Telegraph reported that Keir Starmer and Emmanuel Macron, leaders of Britain and France respectively, when they met last week plotted to “thwart” Trump from ending the war in Ukraine.

Never Trumpers may not actively want war, but they'll tolerate it regardless. The "low-information voters" also leave open the door to war.

The top trends in the press are the Sunday football games. In European countries that are sitting ducks, war with Russia is not even the top headline in the popular press.

California is still counting votes, more than 11 days after polling day — 800,000 uncounted ballots that are holding up final tallies in several contests.

The captured media is trawling through the personal lives of Trump's cabinet picks, hoping to derail his appointments.

The media will distract people until it's too late.

Don't follow crowds. As James Lindsay points out in a recent Tweet, most influence campaigns are "reflexive" -- getting people to believe that others think something, so it must be true.

"They're based on highly-tuned, misleading lies that incorporate some truth and then lead people astray in a way that 'goes viral.' Everyone's talking about it." [2]

War is a reset

The first target of war is always the domestic population. Abroad, it is for resources. The enemy is just the excuse.

The "safe and effective" was not the first assault on the people. You can go back through WW2, WW1, and to the Crimean war of 1853-6, and to the Opium Wars against China, 1839-42 and 1856-60 for examples of countries destabilised, monarchies toppled and the people drugged.

In every case what was happening was the money power grabbing control. They don't want kings who stand up for their people, or a people who stand up to their king. Central banking and usury turns the people in to slaves to the banks in a system that gains profit and mass from centralisation.

Nowadays this means the new world order, a phrase that we heard again and again during Covid. We cannot stress enough that Covid was a monetary event (the work of professor Richard Werner).

See Bank Runs As Pretext For Financial Lockdown - Covid was a monetary crisis - 3rd anniversary mustn't distract from present playbook (Mar 12, 2023)

It was a response to a financial crisis that was then used as an opportunity for a great reset in the words of King Charles and Klaus Schwab.

Covid failed, however. Governments tried to introduce vaccine passports. They built quarantine camps and divided the people with "snitch lines" to report on their neighbours.

People woke up. They realised the "safe and effective" was being used as a pretext to steal liberties, to roll back freedoms in the name of the "greater good," a power grab that had little to do with pandemic, health or good.

Politicians chant in unison about trusting "the science" — on climate, the need to close down energy and farms, the shot for a disease round every corner. Isn't it funny how the response is always the same: lockdown, 15-minute cities, bio-digital identity, programmable money and, from a dark corner, calls to sterlise and euthanise.

War is the next step. It brings on many changes, just faster, with potential for an even greater emergency and martial law to further crush liberty and mandate a new order.

Department of Defense directive 5240.01 issued on September 27, 2024, just prior to the November presidential election allows the US military to use lethal force against American citizens in assisting police authorities in domestic disturbances.

If your friends think the above is a tin foil story, there is a gradual introduction to the World Economic Forum and its proposals for those of a sluggishly cautious temperament.

Many people run a mile when you mention things like bio- digital identity or the centralisation of power in a few hands. This article may help, being from an author more patient and polite than myself. [3]

Normalisation of war

The great powers are in turmoil: There's a hullabaloo in the kitchen (after Harry S Truman).

Are they cooking up a new recipe or pouring the old slops into a clatter of new pans?

Not just in the U.S.: Many Muslim countries have largely abandoned the Palestinians to their fate as the world turns to back to the stove, remaking the world anew.