A sacred king must be sacrificed for the pattern to be complete. The king did nothing wrong, quite the contrary, and probably had to be killed quickly before his real face showed behind the media mask.
As for working against Jews:
The Kennedys worked with, and perhaps owed, the Bronfmans during the prohibition.
JFK secured Kissinger's position as the POTUS' consultant, where Eisenhower and Nixon dared ignore his advice. (Compare the press' treatment of these last two with the first's.)
You are not in the casino, hotels, restaurants, drinks without the blessing of the kosher nostra.
- And before anyone objects, the Jewish mob since the 1890s, and the Red Mafiya since the 1970s, have been much more powerful than the Sicilians. Plenty of books on Amazon celebrating this fact.
JFK would have recognised this as "Just Bizniz".
People may squabble over fences and booze, but large-scale mass war is not the human condition.
Ahh, the British problem. As you always point out it's the bankers and by extension the oilers behind all the wars the US has been involved in. I turned to the dispatches from RFK after this essay and see a clearer picture of British making the problem between the Arabs and Jews much, much worse. I get the feeling that the Balfour Declaration that supposedly meant to give the Jews a homeland --one the Jews believed was the answer to "God's promise"-- was in fact a way to rid the world of Jews once they were totally surrounded by the Arab world. The people themselves could have worked out the differences if the British had not been involved.
In the last report, or previous to that, I mentioned the evidence that King Charles is planning for a Mid East war. The British and Dutch royal families are major owners in big oil, having eliminated their Russian cousin. Hence also their suppression of Mid East rivals.
Perhaps you miss my repeated explanation of "oiler-banker." The exceedingly wealthy do not consider their wealth to reside in corporations, or stocks and shares. If you watch their stooge Laurence Fink, he is destroying corporations with diversity, equity and inclusivity (DEI).
Commodities, land, food, oil will survive the death of the corporate-consumer society. And the biggest owners are the royals, the top bankers, their asset managers...
And if you perform close reading on the Rockefellers and their publicist/ transmission mechanism the World Economic Forum, they've explained their intentions quite clearly.
King Charles and Dutch royals don't control the money flows. Am I correct. When I mention bankers I am thinking of who controls the money that finances all the misery to get what they want, e.i. commodities, land etc. Governments/imperialists are greedy for power and prestige and are used by the Owners. The British and Dutch royal families are some of the Owners
A sacred king must be sacrificed for the pattern to be complete. The king did nothing wrong, quite the contrary, and probably had to be killed quickly before his real face showed behind the media mask.
As for working against Jews:
The Kennedys worked with, and perhaps owed, the Bronfmans during the prohibition.
JFK secured Kissinger's position as the POTUS' consultant, where Eisenhower and Nixon dared ignore his advice. (Compare the press' treatment of these last two with the first's.)
This tells us a lot about Trump, too.
You are not in the casino, hotels, restaurants, drinks without the blessing of the kosher nostra.
- And before anyone objects, the Jewish mob since the 1890s, and the Red Mafiya since the 1970s, have been much more powerful than the Sicilians. Plenty of books on Amazon celebrating this fact.
JFK would have recognised this as "Just Bizniz".
People may squabble over fences and booze, but large-scale mass war is not the human condition.
Ahh, the British problem. As you always point out it's the bankers and by extension the oilers behind all the wars the US has been involved in. I turned to the dispatches from RFK after this essay and see a clearer picture of British making the problem between the Arabs and Jews much, much worse. I get the feeling that the Balfour Declaration that supposedly meant to give the Jews a homeland --one the Jews believed was the answer to "God's promise"-- was in fact a way to rid the world of Jews once they were totally surrounded by the Arab world. The people themselves could have worked out the differences if the British had not been involved.
Cannot both strategies co-exist?
In the last report, or previous to that, I mentioned the evidence that King Charles is planning for a Mid East war. The British and Dutch royal families are major owners in big oil, having eliminated their Russian cousin. Hence also their suppression of Mid East rivals.
Perhaps you miss my repeated explanation of "oiler-banker." The exceedingly wealthy do not consider their wealth to reside in corporations, or stocks and shares. If you watch their stooge Laurence Fink, he is destroying corporations with diversity, equity and inclusivity (DEI).
Commodities, land, food, oil will survive the death of the corporate-consumer society. And the biggest owners are the royals, the top bankers, their asset managers...
And if you perform close reading on the Rockefellers and their publicist/ transmission mechanism the World Economic Forum, they've explained their intentions quite clearly.
King Charles and Dutch royals don't control the money flows. Am I correct. When I mention bankers I am thinking of who controls the money that finances all the misery to get what they want, e.i. commodities, land etc. Governments/imperialists are greedy for power and prestige and are used by the Owners. The British and Dutch royal families are some of the Owners