Did JFK Know The Cold War Was A Construct? Part II

There was a big reason to kill him; and it wasn't just Israel's nukes

Nov 29, 2023

JFK had a front seat on the globalist project
His dad was ambassador to Britain, 1938-40, as it manipulated Germany into war
He knew, perhaps, that war is confected, and that politics is the solution
In office, he applied the same approach to the USSR
He sought to use politics where the corporations and bankers sought conflict
But what if the Cold War was a profitable experiment for those same interests?

See Part I: From Palestine to the JFK Assassination (Nov 26, 2023)
(3,100 words or about a quarter hour of your company)

Did the war boat commander know something the army chiefs didn’t?

Nov 29, 2023

The public execution of president John F Kennedy was a shock that marked the lives of millions. It was only a stepping stone to today’s crisis, however, which is much the greater.

The enduring myth of the event is predicated upon the lone gunman, to which entire sub-genres of Hollywood movies are devoted — the lonesome cowboy, the serial killer, the cold, calculating Doctor Evil.

Not since the Protestant rebellion fractured the Catholic Church — another lone gunman, Martin Luther, we are told — has there been such a challenge to the dominant Western culture.

This is not the clash of civilisations as conjured by Samuel Huntingdon; certainly not between Christianity and Islam, as the bureaucracy would have us believe — relying on that other enduring myth: the horde rising up from the ground like the invisible yet relentless army of terroristic walking dead who “hate us for our freedoms.”

The evil is more banal than the movie. It is subversion from within, by that same bureaucracy. Among the people of the West there is a rising resentment against a legacy global order which the people see as demolishing the civilisation with which they grew up.

This culture had reached its apex with the relentless march of Progress — or so they taught us in school, media and popular culture, until, suddenly those same institutions spun on a dime and declared Western culture was fake, toxic, misogynistic, patriarchal and had to go.

Bureaucrats deflect the resulting confusion and resentment outward, towards the invisible horde and the lone gunman — as we saw in Dublin with last week’s stabbing, which even if organic, was manipulated to spark a reaction, riots, and a solution: more censorship of speech.

But we know the enemy is massed within the citadel.

The attacks on Gaza — by Hamas on the “Gaza envelope” and the retribution of Israel’s government within the walled enclave — are a fault line in which Israel feels it has a free hand to exploit the declining authority of U.S. leadership.

The West’s collusion destroys any claim to moral superiority, and accelerates its decline. It is a self-inflicted slashing at the roots of culture by a hijacked establishment, militarizing and censoring Western nations until they become just another police state.

Another fault line is the monetary system which was allowed to insinuate itself into every crevice; financialising every aspect of society; the pecuniary pestilence infecting everything it touched.

LIHOP or MIHOP

The banking system is rotten. As a financial reporter I go back to the stock market crash of Black Monday, of 1987, and as a youth recall the impact of the oil crisis of 1973, which decades later we see was stage managed. By the time of the bank crunch of 2007-09 it was a case of “let it happen on purpose.”

What is misrepresented as the Great Recession of 2008 resulted from banks using mortgage backed securities (MBS) as a primary asset class, and then fraudulently valuing those MBS in order to leverage their speculation.

It was immediately clear that banks and regulators had no intention of clearing up the mess. They used the same policy instituted after the Dot Com bubble burst in 2000 — cut interest rates to levitate the markets.

In the 15 years that followed, nothing changed except the gradual lowering of interest rates to zero, to inflate asset prices so that no extant bank was required to mark assets to market, which would have rendered them insolvent.

The Covid response was another monetary Band-Aid, calculated to freeze the financial system and thus demand for loans; and funnel trillions in newly-created money into the biggest corporations, while they locked down main street and forcibly closed the shop of mom and pop.

Covid handouts, on top of the money hedge funds already borrowedc cost-free from central banks, expanded the dislocation between prices and value.

Once that goes into reverse, there will be a massive wealth redistribution into the hands of those who control resources and commodities.

Lesser Israel, Greater Israel

As attention shifted from Covid to Ukraine to Israel, the head of the Council on Foreign Relations Richard Haas suggested president Volodymyr Zelenskiy may have to accept the loss of land to Russia, and concede peace.

Ukrainians might justly complain they were duped twice over: to abandon Russia’s subsidies in return for unfulfilled hints of European Union membership; then egged into a war that cost it dearly, in population and territory.

Many people may wonder what was the point of 18 months of war (See upcoming article).

Germany has abandoned neutrality and is rearming. Ukraine sloughed off its Russian population and is being reshaped by asset manager BlackRock and top agricultural corporations. Britain, as 100 years ago, makes no distinction between Bolsheviks and Russians, and is ready to deploy into Germany and Poland.

This, as Alex Krainer has argued, is Britain’s longstanding manipulation of Germany as a wedge against Russia, with Japan as its vanguard in Asia, and the U.S. and its Canadian dominion in the Americas. [1]

Britain’s objective was to build up Germany, and it encouraged Czechoslovakia on the one hand to submit to annexation, while urging others like Hungary, Poland and Slovakia to seek self determination.

In short Britain pretended to oppose Hitler, while encouraging any step short of war. This likely informed JFK’s understanding.

Joseph Kennedy’s backing of appeasement would damage his political career — and later drive him to advance the careers of his sons — all of whom knew about the motivations behind the scenes.

JFK may, for example, have shared insights that led the late professor Antony Sutton of the Hoover Institution to conclude that the Bolsheviks and the Third Reich had not only been manipulated by oil and banking interests, but also had been supplied with Western cutting edge technology throughout their respective existences.

Another who knew was Ernst von Weizsaecker, secretary of state at the German foreign ministry. He was in full contact at all times with London. His son Richard would be president of Germany; his grandson would die in the “war on Covid.” [2]

Abide with me

The short story is that WWII did not end. The years of lead that followed were the result of a decision to keep the U.S. economy on a war footing, while U.S. corporations fought an often bloody battle to profit from Europe's disarray.

In truth the corporate owners had decided that only continued military adventure could perpetuate the profits of WWII — and they demanded the U.S. find one enemy after another.

The intelligence agencies, from the U.S. to Britain had been founded by banking interests, but now flush with public money having captured the public chest as a result of war, they were able to create a second one: the Cold War. This was another scene-scape sculpted by the organs of state to create a false paradigm. The people of the West were told they were locked in a battle of good against the red devil of communism.

This is not as exceptional as it may seem: United States has been at war or has invaded other countries almost every year since independence: for 222 years out of 239, or 93 per cent of its existence.

The oiler-bankers would attempt to forge a United States of Europe through military intelligence, which also ran NATO, creating the necessary enemies. Operation Gladio would see communist cells do battle with fascists — some seemingly organic, others financed and armed by NATO, the CIA and MI6. The agencies would deny involvement but Italian prosecutors would expose them.

Whenever the left or the communists got too close to power, these agencies would bomb the public in order to shift sentiment back to the centre-right. See the documentary for the BBC by Allan Francovich, Operation Gladio. It was made in 1992. They would not show it today. [3]

This bloody mindset of democide was partly the result of the Office of Strategic Services’ reverse takeover of the much bigger SS and the Gehlen Organisation, which was then folded into the nascent CIA. Gehlen's men would run West Germany while promising to penetrate the USSR — so the tail wagged the dog.

The SS men would exaggerate the Soviet threat, its technological capabilities and its industrial advancement, for the same reason the CIA and FBI would do so: to raise their institutional profile and secure a bigger budget.

The CIA saw its duty as promoting U.S. corporations. A signals intelligence operation Echelon was formed in the 1960s on the pretext of intercepting the Soviets and their Eastern Bloc allies. The European Parliament would discover in the 1990s that it was also used by the U.S. for corporate and political espionage.

It is wrong, however to assign corporations a nationality, for that is only their formal registration. They had so recently financed all sides of the war. General Electric was accused in 1946 of raising its costs in the U.S. while subsidising Germany's rearmament. It was at the same time building the electrical infrastructure of the Soviet Union. The story of corporate involvement in the Third Reich is easily found, so we won't spend time on it.

At daggers

Lyman Louis Lemnitzer, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, was President Kennedy's implacable foe. Lemnitzer favoured the aggressive deployment of nuclear weapons, and drew up Operation Northwoods, a plan to explode an American plane and blame it on Cuba as the pretext for an invasion.

JFK thought he could neutralise Lemnitzer by exiling him to Europe where he would be Supreme Allied Commander. However, postwar Europe was CIA central, and he inadvertently placed Lemnitzer at the heart of it.

Kennedy was increasingly alone in a large national security establishment — the State Department, the Pentagon, the National Security Council and the CIA — who fretted that he was trying to end the war against communism instead of trying to win it.

They wanted to fight proxy wars against Soviet satellite states, while preparing for the big one: nuclear war. [4]

President Eisenhower had warned against the military industrial complex; JFK believed he could reach a political solution; but the owner investors still wanted a military solution. It was this appetite for war by the MIC that JFK vowed to stop.

Today we may see that Kennedy was perhaps right without knowing it: the Bolshevik revolution and the USSR were an engineered challenge to the Western way of life — a cultural threat but not necessarily the military one portrayed by the Pentagon.

And since when did the military defend culture? Its doctrine is, as we see today, to destroy that for which it stands, in the name of saving it for the “greater good.” Only the people can save their culture — for the military in claiming to do so becomes society’s destroyer.

Cui bono?

Finance capital profited heartily from the USSR: Ford, General Electric and numerous individual tycoons like Armand Hammer and Fred Chase Koch, for whom the Bolshevik experiment was a foil in the great game.

British prime minister Benjamin Disraeli wrote, against the background of the electoral Reform Acts of the 1830s: “The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scene” (Coningsby, 1844). Disraeli goes on to describe the power of bankers in every major country.

David Rockefeller’s Bilderberg speech of 1991 is better known, but in 1950 James Warburg, son of Federal Reserve co-founder Paul, and nephew of Jacob Schiff and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, told a U.S. Senate Committee: "We shall have world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest."

Had Kennedy succeeded in a political solution to communism — instead of falling to a bullet from a military complex intent on war — would he have disrupted the project?

Confronting the Soviet “threat” allowed the U.S., Britain and France to overlook the continuation of the Nazi continuum. Justice Minister Sabine Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger found the German government in 1957 contained 77 per cent former Nazis — more than Hitler’s Third Reich adminstration. [5]

There had always been glimpses of Nazis who survived the war to hold senior positions:

United Nations – Sec Gen Kurt Waldheim
European Union - First president of the European Economic Community, Walter Hallstein.
NATO – Former Nazis led its Central Europe command from inception until the 1980s when the last of them died. [6]

Others like SS-Gruppenführer Heinrich Mueller just “got away,” among the many granted U.S. citizenship.

An army of reverse conspiracy theorists arises from the graveyard of 1945 Berlin, insisting they know who was buried where, according to a bone fragment revealed by the Soviets half a century ago.

This is just as ridiculous as suggesting our governments today are populated by the descendants of such Nazis.

Leaving politics and the armed services aside, there were even more Nazi leading lights in corporations who survived and thrived, which stands to reason since Nazism was as much a social, corporate project as a political one.

While ordinary Germans were brutally suppressed and “de-Nazified,” the leading lights never ceased to be useful to the oiler-bankers.

And now it’s come out of the closet. In the past three years, Nazism itself has been normalised in Ukraine, and celebrated in Western parliaments — most obviously Yaroslav Hunka, paraded to the applause of Canadian politicians.

Never Again, Nuremberg

Fast forward to today, and some of the same corporations that financed and profited from the Reich while conducting experiments with drugs, chemicals, poisons, medical experiments, social engineering and cybernetics in a police state, planned and implemented the Covid response.

The petrochemical and pharmaceutical cartel I.G. Farben, founded by the Warburg banking family, has been effectively reconstituted by its constituent companies. The public is unlikely to grasp the scale of this tentacled animal: you can talk about anything but the octopus of control.

Two years ago, we saw the effective abolition of the Nuremberg code. We were seized by the arm back to a 1930s eugenics experiment that we thought belonged to the past.

This is not a war, it is genocide. People are waking up but this only makes the times more dangerous; the risk of whiplash from the owners and their bureaucrat functionaries.

Lock step, uniform messaging trumpets from the NATO-European Commission Rapid Response Units, established by former British prime minister Theresa May to align more tightly the political, the military and the corporate.

The public is bamboozled by influencers who portrayed themselves as champions of free speech and religion. When the peddlers of the vaccine arrived, they mounted their soap boxes to sell a counter narrative. When the attack on Gaza arrived, they they realigned almost as one.

There have been snake oil salesmen throughout history. It is no surprise that the promoters of the Covid poison are the Rockefeller dynasty, whose history of snake oil peddling began with the elixir of kerosene, before they used their dominance in the petroleum industry to create petroleum-based pharmaceuticals. [7]

War over politics

JFK would take direct aim at globalists in April 1961 in his speech to newspaper editors. He was talking about vested interests that were manipulating the U.S. in the Cold War. He was addressing what at the time was called communism, which we now know to have been just one in a series of social experiments, and a false dialectic ushering the population towards reaction, solution.

"It requires a change in outlook, a change in tactics, a change in missions--by the government, by the people, by every businessman or labor leader, and by every newspaper. For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence--on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day. It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.
Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed. It conducts the Cold War, in short, with a war-time discipline no democracy would ever hope or wish to match."

JFK’s words echoed those of his predecessor Woodrow Wilson:

"Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men's views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of somebody, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they had better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it." — President Woodrow Wilson, The New Freedom (1913).

History has shown that finance capital and the oiler-bankers in particular accumulate power by creating division, setting migrants against settled populations, religions and castes against diversity of belief, and use that to justify wars, and by the same pretext, reactionary laws.

Until Oct 7th, many people could ignore or deny, but the scales fall, one by one, from millions of pairs of eyes.

The risk is that people will reach for populist leaders, which opens the Gates to charlatans that the powerful will exploit, as so often before.

Remember — hold to your heart — JFK’s insistence on ending globalism, instead of fighting its wars.

If we confront the bureaucrats on a political level, we still have a chance of a political answer to the crises they have created. If they get the war that they want; the coming crackdown will make the Covid response look like a kindergarten roll call.

Moneycircus

Discussion about this post