Crisis Update - The Hancock Lockdown Limited Hangout

Central banker and banal functionary who was the face of "all hands to the pump"

Mar 07, 2023

Matt Hancock is clearly a tool of the banks and increasingly looks like a distraction.
The Telegraph’s exposé ignores the planning of the Covid response and its aftermath.
Eugenics is the man without a face; the continuity that links families and regimes.

See also:
Matt Hancock and the Midazolam Touch -I Can't Breathe - a Very British Way of Death (Sep 13, 2021)
(2,500 words or 12 minutes of your company.)

Mar 7, 2023

Prime minister Boris Johnson had promised that families would spend Christmas of 2020 together but that conflicted with the roll-out of the Covid-19 injection programme planned for December.

The solution is revealed in this WhatsApp exchange with Department of Health media adviser Damon Poole who suggests we can “pitch with the new strain” to which Health Secretary Matt Hancock replies “We frighten the pants off everyone with the new strain.”
Poole: “Yep, that will get proper behaviour change.”
Hancock: “When do we deploy the new variant.”

That would be the Alpha, or Kent variant that would be announced in November 2020.

Britain’s Smeagal is the former heath secretary Matt Hancock who has emerged as a conniving Gollum chuckling over his precious variants (smile courtesy of Mike Adams).

As outrageous as this is, The Telegraph focuses narrowly on the Lockdown and whether the order to isolate was an over-reaction.

It fails to address the low fatality rate from coronavirus, the disappearance in 2020 of flu as it was rebranded as Covid, the damage from the Covid injectable, or the fact that the government’s use of fear was based on social manipulation to manage outcomes — a strategy 10 years in the making rather than a spontaneous exchange on WhatsApp.

The journalist who released the messages, Isabel Oakeshott, says she did so because she fears the UK government’s glacial Covid inquiry will be a cover-up and a whitewash. The Telegraph’s response provides scant reassurance.

The Telegraph’s treatment of the Lockdown Files is selective. It also ignores Matt Hancock’s role in pre-ordering Midazolam in 2019 in preparation for a die-off in hospitals and nursing homes documented by Jacqui Deevoy and the late Wayne Smith.

The Lockdown Files fail to examine the most controversial aspects of Event Covid: the preparation for the announcement of a coronavirus pandemic and the Covid response. This includes the following events and documents:

Event 201 of Oct 2019
the SPARS Pandemic Scenario of 2017 [1]
the Rockefeller “Lockstep” document of 2010 [2]
the World Health Organisation’s bird and swine flu scares of the early 2000s
the scares over foot and mouth, and mad cow disease from the 1990s. [3]

It’s a SIN

The usual caveat applies: motive is a minefield best avoided. That does not mean we have to ignore known events and facts.

This section is an excerpt, written in Sep 2021, from Matt Hancock and the Midazolam Touch; I Can't Breathe - A Very British Way of Death

The title of Secretary of State for Health now carries the suffix ‘and Social Care’. The role was held from 2018 to Jun 2021 by a former Bank of England economist Matt Hancock.

Public finances and tough choices in social care are Hancock’s bread and butter, in the tradition of rationality and thinking the ‘unthinkable’. He is an habitué of the World Economic Forum and the tax-exempt foundations of the Davos hinterland.

Guiding the public to accept hard choices was the focus of an Anglo-French summit in Paris in Feb 2019. Science and Innovation Network (SIN) is based in 40 countries/territories around the world. Government documentation says it supports UK policy… strategic relationships… mutual benefits.

Industrialists, psychologists, academics and bureaucrats gathered in the British ambassador’s residence two-and-a-half years ago to discuss:

genomics — sequencing and data collection from birth
sharing health data — what to do with populations, especially the old
behavioural science — how to get people to accept measures

Britain’s behavioural teams are more advanced than the French, presumably due to the history of the Tavistock Institute. ‘Well-established entities with a history of policy trials in health,’ include:

Public Health Improvement Research Network
Public Health England Behavioural Insights
Behavioural Insights Team

These have been activated during Event Covid, with members aboard the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) and Scientific Pandemic Insights Group on Behaviours (SPI-B) who calculate the degree of fear needed to motivate the public:

“The perceived level of personal threat needs to be increased … using hard-hitting emotional messaging.” (SPI-B minutes of Mar 22, 2020).

Die Meistersinger

Why did the Allies chose to make Nuremberg a song and dance about medicine, given that Germany’s eugenics program was inherited from the U.S., Canada and Britain who provided the research, the funding and in the case of the Rockefellers’ Josef Mengele, the personnel?

It was funded by Macy, Kellogg as well as the oiler-bankers and inspired by the Cold Spring Harbor and Tavistock.

Though doctors were the largest cohort by profession to join the National-Sozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei, the Allies looked the other way in the case of many other Nazis such as many of the industrialists, including the Quandt family who own much of BMW.

It would have been easy to find another pretext on which to convict and hang them for something else, while in the process protecting the image of eugenics.

The Western population, after all, only knew what the state corporate media told them. A nobody of a historian at the time, Hugh Trevor Roper, who had worked for British military intelligence, was about to be given the job of writing the authorized history of the Third Reich from documents supplied to him by military intelligence.

The narrative was controlled. Why let eugenics be thus defiled?

Perhaps the explanation is that they knew it was evil and took the opportunity to project it onto the Germans, while fully intending to continue the research. The OSS-CIA hired many of those they portrayed as schlock-horror scientists.

Charles Darwin’s biggest fan Francis Galton worshipped eugenics. The co-founder of the United Nations Julian Huxley thought eugenics to be the highest branch of science. Cecil Rhodes and Alfred Milner, and their vehicles the Rhodes Scholarship, the Round Table movement, the Council on Foreign Relations and the Royal Institute of International Affairs (Chatham House) considered the British elite the masters of the world. Eugenics was the Anglo religion. It seems it remains so.

Malthus’ disciples

The following section is an excerpt, written in Oct 2021, from Marx's Monumental Error; Titan's shortcomings can help to see The Great Reset more clearly

Thomas Malthus was professor of political economy at the East India Company College and his teachings on population quickly gained prominence, suiting as they did the ambitions of the East India company and the financial interest of the corporate-imperial class.

He has, in the original meaning of nice, a formula that is easy to grasp, seemingly scientific yet reassuringly moral. Malthus says population multiplies geometrically and food arithmetically. His second job as a pastor provided the moral overtones. He must have awed his students.

Who does that sound like — a nifty formula, backed up by moral strictures? It brings to mind that Ted Talk in which Bill Gates invented CO2xPxSxExC.

Those who read The Economist magazine will recognize the satisfying internal logic of every article, fitting the weaver's frame, the weft pressed smoothly into place. The reader leaves with a self-congratulatory feeling that he has understood the world sufficiently to go forth and act. The Economist is praxis, brought to you by the House of Rothschild.

Today those who seek to revive or perpetuate a corporate-imperial ideology still dance around the dry bones of Malthus who died when Marx was 20, the winter before he entered the University of Bonn as a law student.

The graph

The Telegraph newspaper is trawling through Hancock’s emails but portrays “Lockdown chaos” as a matter of incompetence rather than intent.

Is this exclusive focus on Lockdown a ploy to normalise the strategy, to “learn lessons,” and to get it right next time?

The nation’s senior public servant, Cabinet Office secretary Simon Case comes across as immature (he was the youngest person appointed to the job at 41) allowing himself to be politicised, criticising one minister for “pure conservative ideology” and indulging in childish jokes at the expense of travelers stuck in quarantine. He is, however, just a scapegoat. The policy itself is barely questioned.

The Lockdown Files reveal the extent to which the strategy was planned and scripted, including terrorising the population using manipulation and fear to scare people into taking the shots.

The Telegraph fails to acknowledge the media’s complicity in not challenging the narrative while playing stenographer or, if you prefer, pied piper.

A five-day isolation was as effective as 14, but the government did not want to embarrass itself by changing course. Where was the media?

What we’re discovering is that the government has a detailed manual for behavioural psychology.

Having analysed 2.3 million keywords the trove reveals plans to “frighten the pants off” the public, threats to withhold aid to disabled children if MPs didn’t support tougher lockdown measures, and the revealing quip that “Bill Gates owes me one.”

Hancock was touting a British “Variant Assessment Programme” to the World Health Organisation and he wanted Bill Gates’ endorsement. He quipped to his adviser: “Tell him that considering how many people I’m getting his chips injected into, he owes me one!”

Empty beds

While the British public was being told that hospitals were overwhelmed and elective treatments must be postponed to “protect” the National Health Service, Hancock suggested importing French coronavirus patients into Britain. He shared a letter with advisers which offered “spare capacity in London and the south.... We could provide some ICU beds to which you could transfer some patients.”

In the U.S., House Oversight Committee Chairman Rep. James Comer has called Covid fraud “the greatest theft of American taxpayer dollars in history.” Money was lavished in ways never before witnessed. In Britain more than £30 billion was allocated to a Track And Trace app for the NHS.

By the end of 2020, more than 2,500 consultants were working on the project at a cost of £1 million day. Despite the concern of some officials, nothing was done to curb the spending for at least six months, before the end of July 2021.

Just as in the U.S., the impromptu hospitals set up in exhibition centers stood empty. Britain’s Nightingale hospitals cost £530 million. In New York a temporary hospital at the Billie Jean King National Tennis Center cost more than $52 million. It treated just 79 patients.

In the U.S. an estimated $200 billion in federal unemployment benefits were swindled but even that dwarfs the money handed out to corporations.

Why now?

Why is the media revealing the playbook in such detail?

The same manual of fear may be used to push the Central Bank Digital Currencies with a scripted collapse of the banking system, possibly linked to food and fuel shortages to incentivise the gullible into signing up for a digital passport as the price for government aid — perhaps rationing vouchers or some form of Universal Basic Income.

Or it might be another pandemic. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation held a tabletop exercise, Catastrophic Contagion, in October 2022 to simulate a deadly “Enterovirus” that targets children.

Back in 2020

WhatsApp messages confirm the government was implementing the “fear document” from the SPI-B group. This was originally exposed by UK Column so read it there.

On Jul 16, 2020, MC posted on Off-G:

It [the shot] provokes a generalized immune response, modifying DNA/RNA and it’s experimental. That already puts the mRNA vaccine — if mandatory — in the realm of forced medical experimentation and the Nuremberg code.

Will the first version cause massive side effects? meh. The second version may perhaps give a clearer picture of the way ahead, open a pathway and perhaps they’ll test it in Liverpool. The third version may provoke an immune response on the level of auto-immune disease or HiV and may provoke depopulation.

All of these – HiV, auto-immune disease and experimental mRNA – are presented to the pubic as ‘shucks happenstance’ (shit happens, to you and me) and shrouded in unknowns. Yet we’ve already seen the deliberate and relentless spreading of HiV through contaminated blood: we’re told it was just business. OK, so thanks for admitting it was deliberate. Was it also an experiment?

Perhaps Fauci, Gates and Fort Detrick are more acquainted with the intersection of their life-giving or life-taking properties.

On Jun 8, 2020, MC posted to Off-G:

The Covid Event closely follows plans disclosed 15 years ago by Strategic Communications Laboratories SCL which nominally closed down after the Cambridge Analytica scandal in 2018. See Slate, 2005.

“A shadowy media firm steps in to help orchestrate a sophisticated campaign of mass deception. Rather than alert the public to the smallpox threat, the company sets up a high-tech “ops center” to convince the public that an accident at a chemical plant threatens London. As the fictitious toxic cloud approaches the city, TV news outlets are provided graphic visuals charting the path of the invisible toxins. Londoners stay indoors, glued to the telly, convinced that even a short walk into the streets could be fatal.”

SCL’s key associates include Nigel Oakes, Mark Broughton and the Behavioral Dynamics Institute, a virtual lab led by Professor Phil Taylor of Leeds University.

The techniques include manipulating people to demand the new restrictions rather than simply forcing the laws upon us. This video from December 2019 closely foreshadowed Event Covid.

On Jun 7, 2020, MC posted to Off-G:

If the Covid response was an impromptu scramble in the face of an unexpected event, you’d expect a gathering of pharma execs and politicians to be breathing a sigh of relief and taking stock of where we are.

You would see rough edges, disagreement, some tough questions and awkward moments. Instead, the Global Vaccine Summit 2020 in London opened by Boris Johnson, was entirely scripted. There was not a single moment of pause or reflection.

UK Column’s latest broadcast reports on the GAVI “vaccine alliance” $8.8 billion fund raiser. Notably there was no discussion of the successes and failures of the response to Covid-19. No-one spoke off the cuff. Everyone was reading a script. Even in the Q&A the answer was a scripted response – showing that they had the questions in advance.

The delivery by Bill Gates was strident, demanding compliance with his 20-year effort to vaccinate every child on earth… But whatever you think of him, where was the discussion, the reflection at this difficult moment? Lessons learned? After all… the long predicted pandemic has happened. You would think that after contact with reality, the pre-made vaccination plans plans would be adjusted. There was no sign of that. And no comments beneath the YouTube live stream of the Vaccine Summit event.

Support

Seeking to alert people rather than to build a brand, MC used to post to ZeroHedge, before being banned in Jan 2020 — all posts deleted — and later to Off-G.

Only in Jun 2021 did it become clear that sharing information was not a strategy (for a number of reasons third party sites saw it as “squatting”) and the Substack newsletter was launched.

Moneycircus

Discussion about this post