Former colonies say ‘non,’ and France wants to join BRICS
It's a mystery to me that not a single politician has been able / willing to legislate against partnering in any of the efforts of the globalists directing our annihilation. Do they not know that a large majority of the population would support such efforts, or is it true that virtually all leaders are compromised?
So now the start of the taking over of African nations for the good of the globalists? Or possibly africans are tired of being paid off by the bankers and want to join a new group?
So much to say---and I will. But for now, the Maui Incident, as freshest in the readers' minds can be further embellished and buttressed as described with this, from my subscription to Dr Pierre Kory, a man whose medical advice I've followed since May of 2020. (He is not the "A Midwestern Doctor" who authored the piece----to my knowledge.)
Note: I consider Dr Robert Malone a rather slippery character, he's a very ambitious man and his public persona does not always match up with his history of working deep within the federal government. That said, the two Maui residents interviewed herein are worthy of your time in my estimation. (I have not watched the first, shorter, video here.)
I'd press 'like' twice on this article if I could. Really excellent research and writing, thank you MC.
Thanks MC for connecting dots. So someone is doing regime change in Africa wholesale now? And it is always France sitting at the receiving end? Incurring higher energy costs and having to look for different suppliers? A sequel to Nord Stream in the series De-industralize Europe?
"His boss King Charles announced the Great Reset on June 3, 2020. "
As was pointed out on a video on BitChute (where these sorts of comments are still allowed) The legal definition of "reset" is probably not what you think:
"reset in Scots criminal law, the possession of property dishonestly appropriated by another, for example by theft, knowing it to have been so obtained and intending that the owner should be deprived of it. It may be committed by being privy to the retention of the property from the true owner."
Now does that clarify what is going on?