Censors Toy With Global Blackout

Truth & Servitude Part 3. Australia and Brazil seek to silence internet

• Globalist land grab and financialisation of nature is the root of the project

• Need to control systems by which we receive information in times of crisis

• This is the pretext for a State of Exception: tyranny

• Oz censor launched Global Online Safety Regulators Network…

• A U.S. citizen, WEF member, likely with CIA-adjacent training like NPR’s Maher

• And corporate: business pays for Internet; wants biggest say in what’s published

• Values and trust are code for post-democractic government

• Representation is replaced by trust; rights by values; truth by consensus

• Call it post-democracy or post-fascism

Truth & Servitude Part 1 – NPR's Katherine Maher: Corporate censorship complex unveils its latest asset (Apr 20, 2024)
Part 2: Censorship Is A Commercial Proposition - From propaganda to crackdown: follow the money (Apr 22, 2024)
See also:
Brazil's Free Speech Garrote A Globalist Plot - Censorship complex not concerned with veracity but compliance (Apr 11, 2024)
UN Terrifies Youth To Push 'Polycrisis' (Sep 24, 2023)

(2,100 words or about 10 minutes of your company)

U.S. protestors against censorship at office of Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand in 2012

Apr 25, 2024

What objective does censorship serve? The U.S. Congress has provided a masterclass.

It just approved another $95 billion in military spending for Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan. In the very same bill it banned TikTok if its parent company does not sell to an American buyer.

The real objection to TikTok, one of the less censored platforms, is that it’s popular with young people who, at the moment, have a greater tendency to sympathise with Palestinians.

Tomorrow, it could be another cause, a different people; perhaps your own.

Passed at record speed, already signed by the president, the law allows for banning TikTok from the U.S. unless it is surrendered within 90 days to the likes of Larry Fink's BlackRock or Silicon Valley’s Big Tech investors or East Coast hedge funds.

In short, Congress hands over your money, then silences your objections. Just like they did with another multi-billion dollar "bung," to Pfizer and Moderna for the 'coof shot, America got hate speech laws and censorship so that they could not criticise it.

You'd almost think Congress fears exposure for laundering money to itself. Except this censorship effort is global. Congress has merely been paid off.

‘Can't you hear the thunder?’

What thunder?

Australia has seen a series of most peculiar stabbings, leading up to one attack at which politicians leapt into action, calling for a dramatic expansion in censorship.

This was the attack on an Iraqi-born, Assyrian Australian prelate, in Wakeley, New South Wales.

It was portrayed as racial or religious attack by a young Muslim, who from his incompetence — his knife apparently snapped shut on his fingers — and smirking face seemed to be under some sort of influence.

To a man and woman, Australia’s establishment rose as one, demanding global censorship of the livestreamed attack, in order to stop racist speech or violence.

There had been little such outrage the previous week when a stabbing in a Bondi shopping mall was wrongly blamed on a Muslim (by a British MP) and then on a Jew (by Australia’s Channel 7).

This “misinformation” may have been orchestrated.
See Iran, Israel In Slow Dance To War (Apr 15, 2024).

Now the Uniparty of Labor, Liberal and Green, is suddenly demanding the images be blacked out and banned. Not just in Australia, which if they were honestly concerned about violence would be enough, but globally.

Australia’s eSafety Kommisar decreed the images “damaging content” and ordered Twitter/X to prevent any sharing, at a maximum penalty of $500,000 per contravention.

X owner Elon Musk agreed to restrict images in the country but objected “if ANY country is allowed to censor content for ALL countries... then what is to stop any country from controlling the entire Internet?”

Australia’s prime minister Anthony Albanese called Musk an “arrogant billionaire” for refusing to comply; Australian Senator Jacqui Lambie for him to be jailed.

Clearly this is not about Australia:

• Policing speech where the news pertains only to certain groups

• Allowing some to incite violence but not others

• Maximising incidents, minimising protests

• Divide and rule morphing into self-censorship

Censorship backfires

Bear in mind the Streisand effect, where the attempt to suppress information instead draws attention. If officials huff and puff in public we might justly suspect it’s for show.

It recalls the Christchurch mosque shootings in March 2019. In that case social media sites including Facebook, YouTube, Reddit, and Twitter responded to calls from the New Zealand government to remove the video from their platforms.

As per Wikipedia, which according to its co-founder is compromised by the corporate-military establishment, “The attack was linked to an increase in white supremacy and alt-right extremism globally observed since about 2015.”

There’s your narrative.

The European Commission vice president for “values and transparency,” the Czech politician Věra Jourová, ponders whether “it’s a good thing to have the digital sphere to influence… real life.”

The Aussie from WEF-USA

The person in charge of Australia’s attempt to censor the world is an American citizen, a contributor to the World Economic Forum and, for all we know, has had the same CIA-adjacent training as NPR’s Katherine Maher.