When The Satirists Take Charge

War is hell, bankers fund both sides and politics is theatre

Mar 06, 2022

War is tragedy, that takes kids from bouncy castles to front lines in 10 years
Satire is politics - prancing Pommeranians, propagandising the public mind
Duty is a job on the board of a weapons company for having done their bidding

(3,000 words or 10 minutes’ read.)

Mar 6, 2022

Truth is the first casualty of war but it has a way of sneaking up on you. Only so much war can be hidden. Motives are revealed by action.

Bankers were on both sides of all major conflicts of the 20th century. What makes you think this one's different?

What is Ukraine — Europe's poorest nation; it's most corrupt? Why does the CIA have XXX people in the country, and George Soros make it a base? Russiagate was run from there and the attempted impeachment of president Donald Trump.

Clearly Ukraine is not interesting to intelligence merely as a victim of Russia. Biolabs are denied by the press but were documented on the U.S. embassy web page. Ukraine is a den of spooks.

It is a center of people trafficking. And that means organ harvesting. Until the military blew up the rail lines it was on the Silk Road from the fentanyl factories of China. It is the very opposite of a rules-based international order.

It is lawless, like a giant Kosovo (11,000 km2); Ukraine is 603,000 km2. It is Europe's largest territory after Russia, with whom it has a long border. You can get lost there.

In the last article we saw how one of those networks is the legacy Nazi movement whose organizations, and until they died off personnel, reach back directly to WW2.

Multipurpose, interconnected, sustainable

The Western military makes use of the Azov Battalion. Oligarchs find it appropriate to fund them — tycoon Igor Kolomoyskyi is widely reported to back and employ Azov Battalion. Ethnically he cannot be attracted to its Nazi heritage. There must be something useful in a network that is covert, disciplined and brutal.

The Anti Defamation League has spotted the non-sequitur. It felt the need for Band Aid and published a bizarre blog entry “Why is Putin Calling the Ukrainian Government a Bunch of Nazis?” [1]

Another author Lev Golinkin of The Forward has documented the Ukraine government’s Nazi leanings extensively.

See Moneycircus, Mar 4, 2022 — Eurasia note #30 - When Is A Nazi Not?: Hush now, when he's doing our work. Nuland calls Russia's security concerns fantasy.

Why, now are we seeing a confected unanimity — what the Washington Post describes as: “Yay, everybody thinks the same.” Or Mar 4, 2022 — “A rare moment of unity on Ukraine”?

Just as as the monotony of acceptable opinion on Covid began to effloresce into something approaching debate — independent minds colliding — along came Ukraine.

We have regressed and the people absorb, unquestioning once again, the fear and foreboding broadcast from the appeal to authority, poured into the brainwashed minds of the masses. The categorical, the labeled, the sectioned. Half the population should be sectioned.

Mysteries unraveled:

Why has the ADL come out in favour of Ukraine's Nazis?
Why did Johnny Vedmore focus only on Schwab's Nazi links?
Why are the Nazis even in Ukraine?
Why did AH launch Barbarossa and why did Ukrainians join him?
Why is Pfizer's Israel cauldron effectively a testing zone?
Why did Marx hate the Slavs, AH too, and neocons today?

See Moneycircus, Mar 4, 2022 — Eurasia note #30 - When Is A Nazi Not?: Hush now, when he's doing our work. Nuland calls Russia's security concerns fantasy.

I’ve seen that movie, too

No one would accept a movie plot where the bad guy had no motive, much less a novel.

In life, the thief or hoodlum takes flesh on the tabloid page. Without wrongdoing rooted in vengeance or malice the audience is offended, the script anti-cinematic.

When it comes to the rich and privileged, suddenly motivation is ignored or excused as affluenza: the wealthy can’t have malicious motive because they don’t share our morals.

Khazaria, Khazaria may God thy gold refine

Ukraine is located in territory that between 600-900 AD was part of the Khazarian Empire. It provided the Bolsheviks that took over the Russian Revolution, with the support of German, Swiss, American and London-based bankers. It promptly tipped the world's biggest agricultural exporter into famine, followed by a cultural onslaught that toppled arguably the world's zenith of music, dance and literature.

We know the Nazis were as much a project of the Khazars as the Bolsheviks (proven by Antony Sutton to be the same interest that financed both) but since they control the narrative, we are still struggling to piece the picture together.

History does not repeat but it tolls like a bell.

“The Rada, the petty bourgeois nationalists who represented Ukraine at Brest-Litovsk, preferred to ally with the “Great Powers”, first Germany, then later England and France, rather than with the Bolsheviks.
This was a catastrophe. Germany detached Ukraine from the revolution with cynical promises of “independence”, in practice occupying it. This was the centrepiece of a wider strategic land grab designed to damage the revolution to the point of destroying it. It very nearly succeeded. The Bolsheviks were split down the middle… Lenin won the argument but the price was hunger, even starvation.” [2]

The Song Remains the Same

Today the German WW2 land grab has been repeated. We are told that the perpetrators are different.

In the novels of MI6, authored by Ian Fleming, the scheming opponent is simply evil or perhaps loves gold.

Is evil central to a pepetrator, is cohesion essential to identity? Kolomoiskyi shows that money is blind. It's a vector for psychopathy. So what is uniting the rich in this project?

The press shies away, or is paid to ignore the painful question of who.

Who is buying Ukraine when oligarch gangsters Pinchuk and Kolomoiskiy are front men, just like Abramovich?

Who employs the brown shirt chorus boys, paid by those oligarchs. Who writes the script?

Prance on, Satire, and dance

Is it still satire when a president sublimates satire — a comedian whose on-screen role a president first elides with real life, then eclipses it?

You've probably seen the skit where he machine guns the oligarchs. Now satire, having served as a vehicle to subvert reality and move the same man from the role of TV actor president into the actual presidency, is being erased.

Evidence of the magician's prestidigitation is being scrubbed from the Internet by the handlers of Google and Twitter, who are the likely the same who handle Mr Z. Is it still satire when a president neutralizes satire, a comedian whose on-screeen role a president elides with real life, then eclipses it?

Satire is neutralized by flattery, while the virtual character of the TV president takes physical form just as gas, by thermodynamic deposition, becomes solid and Volodymyr Oleksandrovych Zelenskiy enters the hallowed parchment of history, a knight warrior.

Zelnskiy's high heels dance in 2014.

A Twitter thread by the aptly-named Aristophanes Tragedy follows the rise of the TV entertainer as a tool of the oligarch Ihor Kolomoyskyi.

The Greek playwright Aristophanes famously mocked the businessman-warrior Cleon in the first phase of the Peloponnesian War.

The thread, elegantly summarised by Rhoda Wilson on The Exposé, recalls the element of revenge, in which Kolomoyskyi was dismissed as Governor of Dnipropetrovsk Oblast. He used his television channel to promote a show, “Servant of the People” in which Zelenskiy mocked a fictional representation of Kolomoyskyi enemy, president Petro Poroshenko. [3]

Kolomoyskyi is one of several prominent Ukrainian oligarchs to spread their influence to Washington, as chronicled by Yaacov Apelbaum, as their tentacles spread like grape vines through weapons manufacturers, embassies, intelligence assets and, as a side shoot, into the pockets of members of Congress. [4]

One begins to see how a war in Ukraine might even profit some of those who shout patriotic slogans from the safety of Western television studios.

In the age of the Internet, Poe’s Law says any parody may be taken for a sincerely-held view. Emma Gray Ellis argued that ambiguity is often cover for hate speech, in an article for the hip end of the Mockingbird media, Wired magazine. She missed the deeper point that ambiguity is baked into satire, and that the power of the message lies in that ambiguity.

That is why the intelligence agencies have moved far beyond controlling magazines like Encounter, Ramparts, Popular Mechanics, and Wired, Vox and Vice, and into the theatrical managment of reality itself.

Downgrading the press

Newspapers, magazines and television are less important in this new age of performance. There is little effort today to cultivate different audiences beyond the hackneyed attempt to capture the youth, through lingo and the latest cause.

All channels blast an identical message. The political managers and their military cyber soldiers have the resources to create a vibrant, walled garden — they simply don’t bother. Press and television are no longer important except as background noise.

The are discarded becaused they’re not interactive. In today’s world of mass formation, social media is a far more powerful tool to play with the public’s mind.

At the same time the peformers have moved off the small screen and into real life. Trump was, like Zelenskiy, a television persona. Trudeau was a drama teacher, Boris Johnson a career buffoon.

You don’t need the press to cover up or spin a narrative, if the politics is itself the drama show and the public’s psychology is manipulated directly through social media.

Recall that in 2012 Facebook conducted an emotional experiment on 700,000 users in which it manipulated the news feed to prompt certain reactions. It monitored the words people used in reaction to what they saw, read and shared.

The Guardian newspaper wilfully missed the point at the time, framing it as an issue of privacy. Facebook said no users were identified by the two universities involved, and that the experiment was intended to improve users’ mental health — again diverting attention away from the experiment’s outcome as cybernetic governance.

Psychologists proved to be humanity’s unreliable confidant, a prelude to their collusion with governments to create fear during Event Covid. Katherine Sledge Moore, a psychology professor at Elmhurst College, Illinois, said terms and conditions negated ethical concerns, again ignoring the opportunities for corporate, political and military psychopaths. You can be sure the experiements continued. [5]

New skins for old

It’s not a new idea; more a revival. In the ancient tradition of theatre and magic, psycho-drama or psyop is not a "cover" for anything. Narrative is politics. Theatre must happen in order for the people to be governed; ritual reinforcing the right of the ruler or community.

See Moneycircus, Jan 16, 2022 — Mass Formation And Psycho-Drama: How ancient political technologies see the light of day

The NATO military alliance is becoming less steamroller than dream roller. It has fired up a new vehicle for war. Forget air, land, sea, space, and cyber. The key battleground is the human domain. Enter, the mind.

“The brain will be the battlefield of the 21st century,” it says in a report: Cognitive Warfare Project, 2020. “Humans are the contested domain.” Future conflicts “will likely occur amongst the people digitally first and physically thereafter in proximity to hubs of political and economic power.”

See Moneycircus, Oct 15, 2021 — Mind Wars Unleashed: Military swaps steamroller for dream roller

Mind wars

It is not the first time that NATO or Europe’s military has presented control of human perception as an imperative. Britain’s outgoing Chief of the Defense Staff General Sir Nick Carter has repeatedly spoken of the enemy at home, of the difficulty of separating the enemy abroad from the man in the corner shop.

Hybrid war, the replacement of the polarities of peace and war by a state of permanent conflict... The UK government under Theresa May set up Rapid Response Units to coordinate public messaging between governments that is apparent in the unified voice of Event Covid.

Nor is NATO’s idea new. It bears some similarities to the report, From PSYOP to MindWar: The Psychology of Victory, by Col Michael A. Aquino, a psychological intelligence officer with the U.S. Army and a founder of the Temple of Set.

“The advantage of Mind War is that it conducts wars in nonlethal, noninjurious, and nondestructive ways. Essentially you overwhelm your enemy with argument. You seize control of all of the means by which his government and populace process information to make up their minds, and you adjust it so that those minds are made up as you desire.
Everyone is happy, no one gets hurt or killed, and nothing is destroyed. Ordinary warfare, on the other hand, is characterized by its lack of reason. The antagonists just maim or kill each other's people, and steal or destroy each other's land, until one side is hurt so badly that it gives up [or both sides are hurt so badly that they agree to stop short of victory]. After such a war there is lasting misery, hate, and suffering.” [6]

Whether Aquino believed in Satanism or was, like Jim Jones and his People’s Temple, another dabbler on the fringes of the intelligence community — and perhaps involved in psychological intelligence experiments — he is being scrubbed from Wik at this very moment. His MindWar co-author Maj Gen Paul Vallely is still there; Aquino’s Wikipedia has vanished.

Moneycircus