Regaining Control of Events
Push aside the Covid narrative - the Doctors for Covid Ethics Symposium
Getting a full picture of events taking place in the world during Covid is hard. For some, it’s traumatic. A psychologist will tell you the main responses are to bury trauma or to obsess on the same issues in the hope they’ll resolve themselves.
This week scientists, lawyers and economists, hosted by Doctors for Covid Ethics, delivered the closest we’ve got to a full picture. This takes us beyond the cultivation of fear by state-corporatist megaphones or the tendency of some alt media bloggers to rehash cause and effect— and instead to gain a clearer view of the path ahead.
“We believe we are right to oppose the vaccines but if you want to go ahead and can win the argument, so be it. Just leave the children out of this.”
Those are the words of Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, the Thai-German microbiologist, giving his closing message to the online symposium of Doctors for Covid Ethics.
The event, which covered Thursday and Friday evenings of this week, brought together experts in the fields of medicine, law, ethics and economics. Together they gave the most complete picture that the audience is likely to find in one place of the origins, conduct and possible outcomes of the pandemic.
The casual observer could be forgiven for shielding their ears at the months-long din of information about its nature and origins. These include the relabeling of flu, whose sudden vanishing the World Health Organization’s own figures acknowledge; the misuse of PCR tests to create false positives, which the WHO admits; the when, where and how of the “novel” coronavirus; its origins in a laboratory, that were first denied by the state-corporatist media and a year later asserted. [1]
No-one needs more information in general. They need to know why it keeps changing and what this signifies.
Making sense is not helped by a welter of competing waves of experts, each crashing against the other, on matters that would be complex even if the most patient expert explained them in a still voice, the calmest professor tutoring his students, a whiteboard to his side.
Such a person is Dr Bhakdi. He turned again to his whiteboard this week, using it on a video conference to show what effect the multiplication of spike proteins has on the body’s own defences and how that can harm, not enhance, our immunity. His explanations can be found online with relative ease, despite censorship.
What makes Bhakdi impressive is his scientific, medical and academic experience. What makes him persuasive is the manner in which he lays out information and the openness with which he appears to say, this is my conclusion, take it and draw your own. The experts presented on the television news could not be more different. [2]
The tone of official experts during Event Covid has gone from kindly nanny to exasperated schoolmaster, to army drill sergeant, and finally to judge, jury and executioner.
That’s because the official narrative has changed. It began with, kindly stay indoors for 14 days while we “flatten the curve” to keep the hospitals empty — which worked so well that governments started prosecuting the public for filming empty wards. About 500 days later the narrative is anyone who refuses the vaccine or the vaccine passport is a threat to society and may soon be imprisoned in their home or a quarantine facility.
The online symposium of Doctors for Covid Ethics was a chance to pause and take stock. And that is exactly the message from Dr Bhakdi: let’s all sit down and discuss where this is going. People are getting injured by the vaccines. Simply denying it will not do. For governments to propose injecting children regardless of their parents’ consent is unacceptable, for those children themselves are incapable of giving informed consent as defined by the Nuremberg Code.
Voices like union leaders supporting mandatory Covid vaccination, have claimed the Nuremberg Code relates to Auschwitz not Covid but Vera Sharav, herself a childhood survivor of the NAZI reign of terror, is categorical:
“The Nuremberg Code is the single most important document in medical ethics.”
Now in her 80s, the president of the Alliance for Human Research Protection says people are being traumatized by fear into taking an experimental gene therapy and are suffering side effects on a mounting scale. [3]
“I cry to think what poison was poured into their minds that they don’t stand up for themselves as I did at six years old — and it saved my life.”
She has an explanation why people today do not question what’s happening around them, like she did all those years before.
“There has always been a silent majority in the U.S. that does not talk politics. Because of that they are unaware. It’s made worse by people wearing masks, which sends the message that you should not trust, you do not talk to anyone.”
Origins and Outcomes
Some people argue the merits of masks and lockdowns; others about more grave concerns like the vaccination of children; still others point to the “mercy killing” bills making their way through multiple parliaments. These are important but they miss the fundamental change that is taking place parallel to Event Covid. We could call these the fundamental motivations.
One of these is undoubtedly technocracy or the intersection of technology, eugenics and cybernetics.
Patrick Henningsen, founder of 21st Century Wire and one of the moderators of the symposium commented: ”The fact is that the word transhumanism came out of the eugenics movement.”
Patrick Wood, a pioneer of authorship on technocracy and collaborator of the late Prof Antony Sutton, quoted a friend, who recently passed away, the researcher into UN Agenda 21, Rosa Koire (1956-2021). She had said that the plan for seizure of the world and its resources is all-embracing:
“It is the inventory and control plan for all land, all water, all minerals, all plants, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all food, all energy, all information and all human beings in the world.”
The Pandemic is a Monetary Event
Central banks are privately owned. The Federal Reserve central bank is owned by about eight closely-allied families.
This is how the central banks gain more power (accurate but simplified version):
In the beginning, governments issued money.
Then bankers persuaded governments they could have more money if they borrowed from the banks — the lure of credit. Sweet for the banks because they create money out of thin air.
Banks ‘print’ ever-more money, leading to booms. As each boom turns to bust, the banks call on the collateral and take control of more assets: farmland, property, city centers, military bases, corporations and utilities and infrastructure.
Before Event Covid, central banks agreed that if the economy faltered, bailout money should go not to retail banks but direct to large corporations – which are owned by the same families as the central banks via investment firms like BlackRock, State Street and Vanguard.
Event Covid results in lockdown. Banks create massive amounts of money and give it directly to corporations who buy up assets while small and mid-sized businesses are closed.
After Event Covid, central banks plan to replace money with digital credits and replace salaries with universal basic income — there will be no way for the ordinary person to ever get a mortgage, buy a property or build a business.
The Pandemic Plan and Response
There are so many strands to Event Covid it would need a pin board to connect those threads at crucial places, in order to get a sense of all that’s happened, who’s done it and to discern motives.
As a retired librarian, Vera Sharav knows how recognizing patterns can make sense of information. “The uniformity around the world, the same directives and decrees, tells me [the governments] are following orders.”
The coordination of government, but also of the media, indeed suggests they’re reading a script from a limited number of sources, if not a central point of authority. As former Pfizer scientist Dr Michael Yeadon noted, parliaments and legislatures have been sidelined. The Canadian economist Prof Michel Chossudovsky told the symposium: “Democratic governance has disappeared.’
This is another point in the story where voices on the television news sneer but end up conveying only their own ignorance. You don’t have to spend decades as a financial journalist (as this author did) to know that the higher you go up the tree, the greater the wealth. Power is centralized and the greater the power, the more tightly it is held.
John Titus is a lawyer by training, with a knack for simplifying those parts of banking and finance that most of us would rather ignore. The pandemic is entirely a monetary event for banks to gain more control. He shows that policies like lockdown, the closing of businesses and the freezing of the economy was prepared months before anyone had heard of Covid.
The plan was prepared by BlackRock through which the world’s richest families — such as Rockefeller — invest their wealth. The plan was implemented by the Federal Reserve, the privately-owned central bank that controls the U.S. dollar.
Richard Werner, author of the book and documentary Princes of The Yen, has written about the growing power of these families for years. They also control, through the central banks, the Bank for International Settlements, the World Bank and the IMF. They also influence through philanthropy and their tax-evading foundations the United Nations and the World Health Organization, and the non-governmental organizations (NGOs or charities) that work with and for the above. Dr Werner told the symposium what he sees happening next.
“We end these policies and go back to stable growth or we will get more of what we’ve seen in recent decades of central banks promoting boom bust and using downturns to promote structural transformation. This is still their key goal: a great reset.”
Catherine Austin Fitts, of the financial consultancy Solari, is a former investment banker and spent time in politics, running the Housing and Urban Development department under the first Bush presidency. She warns:
“As a mechanism to exert control the crisis has been a great success. Governments have lost information sovereignty. The officials have taken control and the intelligence agencies are listening in [giving instructions] on the phone. Politicians lack the people’s support to get out of this trap because the population really believes there is a medical pandemic instead of a coup d’etat.”
Closing The Circle
There is a lot of fight in these people, despite their dire warnings if we sit back and do nothing. German-American lawyer Reiner Fuellmich is preparing legal cases based on the Nuremberg Code and on evidence of malfeasance by officials and institutions.
"The judiciary is almost totally corrupt in Germany but the Anglophone countries have pretrial discovery and class actions. That is why we will launch international class actions. This is bigger than crimes against humanity; this is crime against creation itself.”
So many doctors, nurses and bureaucrats are participating, even with the example of Nuremberg as a warning, and just like in those times, much of the population seems content to sit back. Dr Fuellmich has spoken to Prof Mattias Desmet of Brussels who describes it as mass hypnosis. When applied, about 30 per cent of the population is able to feel nothing, and only about 20 to 30 per cent is resistant. “And that’s us. It’s up to us to keep educating the people.”
The Doctors For Covid Ethics symposium was broadcast on UK Column whose correspondent Alex Thomson, a former GCHQ analyst, sees another reason why people should be “only following orders”.
The authorities have for more than half a century used applied behavioural psychology to find compliant people to fill such roles.
“If you have the means of profiling and priming people, you get to select people who think they got into a top civil service job or academia because of their own efforts. They may have been pre-funnelled, not because they are good at their job but because they are a particular psychological type. William Sargant wrote about this in the 1940s and arcane societies were talking at the time about selecting the type of people necessary to fill the roles of administration.”
Fuellmich still holds out hope for a legal solution but increasingly a feeling has grown within him that resolution will no come through the judicial system.
“I’m not a religious person but the real judgment will not come from the courts of law. There is going to be a great reckoning that has been overdue for hundreds of years and it’s coming.”
Dr Michael Yeadon, former vice president at drugs giant Pfizer Inc. who founded his own biotech firm, has been a prominent voice criticizing the strategy of governments and Big Pharma.
He drafted what he calls the Eight Lies which he says governments around the world have been spouting in unison. It was this coincidence — of making the same mistakes, giving the same excuses, at the same time, and sticking to them regardless — that led him, over the past six months, to conclude that the real motives have nothing to do with a medical scare or a virus.
“Aldous Huxley said a scientific dictatorship has no natural end. If you let it begin it will go on forever. If they can switch off food in real time, you will never persuade your fellows to join you in rebellion.
“Your decision to be courageous now will affect your life and all of your children and grandchildren.”
[1]
Anthony Fauci said tissue masks could not stop the spread of respiratory virus before saying they must — and that you’d need two. British ministers insisted they had no plans for vaccine passports but maybe a track and trace app or Google Passes app. Now it has just said that 30 countries signed up to its ‘Covid passport’.
[2]
This gets to the heart of the clash of experts competing for your attention. How do you decide whom to believe?
It starts with you. To whom do you give your time? It’s easy to say of a person, “I wouldn’t give him the time of day.” It’s simple not to listen to someone. It needs patience and determination to stop and give someone your time.
It is not about experts. It is about you. No amount of credentials, however impressive, can bolster or undermine an argument if you don’t listen. That is why the cancel culture in the years just prior to Event Covid is so damaging.
Cancel culture is political. Was it politically motivated, training people to shut their ears before someone utters a word? Privilege is political. Was it politically motivated, training people to believe certain people are not entitled to an opinion, however qualified they may be to speak on a topic?
How people speak is a clue to their veracity. If we are calm and open, we lay our cards on the table. Imagine if the debate was about a physical object like a wind-up clock. I could say, “here, hold it. You decide if I am right. Tell me how you think it works.”
A con man can do this too, of course. He opens his eyes, opens his arms, show his palms. This classic training of a doorstep salesman was adopted by the television broadcasters. Have you noticed how almost all reporters show their hands? How presenters raise the eyebrows to simulate openness.
The apparent proximity of the television anchor amplifies the effect. Comparing perspective, only your spouse or closest friend would dare to stand so close. Now, follow their eyes: they hold yours. When the anchor starts nodding her head, you instinctively want to nod yours in affirmation.
The tricks of the salesman.
[3]
Hired voices, usually writing public relations advertorials in the press (often called fact checkers, but paid for by commercial interests and pharmaceutical companies) may deny that the Covid vaccines are experimental or that governments are using fear to impose them. You can check both for yourself. Behavioural psychologists, especially those working for the UK government, are on record discussing how to manipulate public emotions. The vaccines are authorized for emergency use, not approved through the same procedure as regular vaccines.
[4]
Consent & Refusal Forms at Doctors4CovidEthics Org:
Excellent peice Moneycircus. Due to work I haven't had the chance to watch the Doctors 4 Covid Ethics symposium yet, tho tomorrow is my day off and will do so then. I've already seen a number of glowing reports about it.
Things you only "think" you know. Re: Rosa Koire, for instance:
https://nikiraapana.blogspot.com/