Chronicle of Dissent - SPARS Document
Veiled threats of terror or civil war in official scenarios
Sep 14, 2021
If you think Archduke Franz Ferdinand was exposed when he drove through Sarajevo in an open-top car, consider the world’s politicians right now.
By acting in unison like a troupe from Central Casting, they create the perception of one big target. A great, pasty-faced parade of sitting ducks in a shooting arcade. And now Joe Biden, with incendiary tone and language, is provoking a reaction. [1]
Whoever wrote the words for Biden knew their import: ‘What more is there to wait for? What more do you need to see?… Our patience is wearing thin, and your refusal has cost all of us.’
Also provocative, the simultaneous announcements that Congressional staff would be exempt from a federal vaccine mandate.
Australians have felt the same provocation for months now. The significance lies in those who speak their message through Biden’s teleprompter. This is a message to all of us in every country to be on our guard.
A timely appeal for peace has come from market analyst Tom Luongo. ‘Biden declared war on 80+ million Americans and threatened Governors of sovereign states with intervention or removal.’ Biden is trying to provoke violence, he says:
This is what they want you to do. Then they can justify to the self-righteously vaxxed that you deserve internment camps. That you are the terrorists.
Just exude, ‘No.’
Because they’re only recourse then is more violence. And every act of violence delegitimizes them further.
What is the advantage to the Great Resetters of a physical confrontation? It could speed up the transition; it could remove incumbents who have served their purpose; it could alter the forces on the ground, for example, replace defunded police with centralized military.
What suggests that the politicians are being set up. Look how they have behaved:
entitled -- 'rules for thee and not for me'
inconsistent -- imposing conflicting rules
arbitrary -- banning or permitting actions on a whim
hectoring -- using whining, aggravating tones
bullying -- threatening the people
hardhearted -- dismissing people's cares or fears
brutal -- imprisoning people in quarantine camps
This is this the reverse of the calm and decisive action you would expect if there was a measured global response to a real pandemic. This is scripted chaos. See my article Bad and The Ugly, Aug 23.
They mimic each others’ policy, behaviour, language, stance and tone. Yes, they are role players in a live exercise. They are exposed in No Man’s Land and look to each other for guidance. It is hardly surprising they copy each other but they read from a hymn sheet. Their talking points prove that.
Departing the script
The politicians may not realize it but they are being set up as a target. The underlying theme of this play is destruction — and it doesn’t matter if it was planned or scripted, it has its own dynamic now. From molten lava something new will emerge. You don’t 6uild 6ack 6etter unless your home burns down.
The praxis that reflects the business m.o. of fintech and the digital financial sector as enacted in Event Covid is to destroy the old order and make way for the new.
There is no place for humanity, for the mediation of morality in this new world and it’s already clear that politicians occupy as much space in the future plans of the technocracy as human hamburger flippers.
Their uniformity raises the dangerous possiblity in my mind that an attack, false flag or genuine, could trigger copy cats and a conflagration. The fact that intelligence agencies are warning about such attacks means a false flag is a distinct possibility.
Terror as prelude
‘Is there any means known more effective than war, assuming you wish to alter the life of an entire people?’ — minutes of the Carnegie Foundation, 1908.
How is creative destruction shaping up so far:
chaos in travel, supply chains, education, health care
devastation in Main Street, livelihoods and the mental health of billions
death is an emerging threat from insufficiently tested gene therapies
War is the granddaddy of them all. This time the technocrats feel sufficiently well established that they can try to ‘alter the life of an entire people’ as if they already have defeated us. War has always been the mechanism for change in the past, however, and it remains a fall back.
‘I am in blood Stepp'd in so far that, should I wade no more, Returning were as tedious as go o'er.’ — Macbeth, Act 3.
By Nov 2020, the Davos had ‘pulled off the biggest psy-op in history with COVID-9/11 and now they’d just stolen the most important election in the world.’ They would not be stopped, Luongo writes.
Contrary to misdirection by fact checkers, it does not matter if the scripted scenarios like Event 201, SPARS or the Rockefeller ‘Lock Step’ document explicitly envisage certain activity in a specific location. As the Carnegie quote shows, they promoted war before two world wars and they could do it again. [2]
Contrary to the certitude of certain alt-media researchers — James Corbett once asked why people still talked about SPARS when he’d reported it years ago. — ‘no plan survives first contact with the enemy.'
The significance of the ‘failed therapeutic’ Kalocivir in SPARS only became apparent once we saw Remdesivir follow the same story arc, presented as the saviour but causing nasty side effects (Remdesivir can cause kidney failure). These story lines have become so familiar they are practically TV tropes.
Avoiding war
Anthony Fauci poured fuel on Biden’s fire. The director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases said: ‘We have a pretty hardcore group of people that we’re trying to persuade them — or mandate them, if they’re not persuaded — to get vaccinated.’
It is not even necessary for people to take the bait. The Jan 6, 2021 Capitol incursion was led by FBI informers. Police are on video waving them in, as they dutifully step within the ropes.
Governments can create domestic firefights if these create the justification for pre-existing policies such as the replacement of defunded police with military, or the use of pre-constructed containment camps under the pretext of health or social order.
Read Luong for yourself but he makes the case for avoiding arguments with Covidians — either about the virus or their political pecadilloes. [3]
This isn’t about the vaccine. It never was. The only public health crisis now is a public mental health crisis.
The people who’ve been broken by the COVID-9/11 terror campaign have their own issues to work out. They can be forgiven their terror but it’s time for the grown-ups to talk. The children can be excused from the table.
So, the opposite of their hysteria is needed. They don’t need a punch in the mouth, they need therapy. No more negotiating with facts. They are immune to facts.
As he was writing those words I penned something similar.
Our political know-how is kindergarten level and it’s time to change that. No-one has challenged the aims beneath the Politically Correct, Woke assaults on our freedoms. I don’t mean their political philosophy (that’s playing their game) I mean their emotional and mental stability.
Imagine you have someone who loudly espouses radical views but that person is emotionally a reactionary. What do you get — who are they?
They demand individuals submit to the community not because they are generous but because they are fearful.
They want wealth offered up not in a spirit of sharing but kleptocracy.
They claim to respect races, classes and diverse voices but their inner voice speaks of envy and resentment.
They promise empowerment yet they fear others and mow down the tall poppies.
Posing as free thinkers they close whole avenues of speech and refuse to debate.
They promote safe spaces and attack, aggressively, anyone who kindles their own timidity.
In the name of benevolence they aim to make you suffer until you ask for their prescription of equity.
The only politics they know is deception, their militant tendency hiding their intent.
The bald fact is they are not radicals and there is no point in treating them as a radical. They are a front for somebody else’s power grab. They are largely dupes, drawn into professional bodies that are fronts for financial interests.
If and when their project collapses they will claim they were just fellow travelers, swept up with the mass. Perhaps like me you see the hand behind the elimination of tenants, of useless eaters, claimants and liabilities.
Living with it
Fighting them would hasten our own destruction. We must, once again, tolerate them but refuse to cooperate. Build our own networks, rely on our own people but avoid the division of conflict.
I make a distinction for personal survival. I have said that anyone’s attempt to forcibly vaccinate me would be a matter of life and death and I will respond in kind. I advise anyone else to consider what they would do in that circumstance.
[1] BMJ, Sep 13, 2021 — US imposes mandatory vaccination on two thirds of workforce
[2] The Rockefeller Foundation and the Global Business Network, 2010 — ‘Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development’.
Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, 2017 — The SPARS Pandemic 2025–2028: A Futuristic Scenario to Facilitate Medical Countermeasure Communication
[3] Tom Luongo, Sep 13, 2021 — Quietly Say “No” to Joe Biden’s Call for Civil War