Opinion - Call For 'Pandemic Amnesty' Exposes A Cult

Slavish adherence to Covid doctrine, no concession, but plea for more vaccination

Nov 04, 2022

Sane government requires accountability, not vague appeals to the Common Good.
Corruption of institutions is a greater threat than wrong-think.
The perpetrators refuse to admit motive.

Officials use fear, gaslighting or spooking the public to project cultish behaviour.
Witchery was Charles Manson’s term for spooking and gaslighting individuals.
Did Emily Oster even write the article at her own initiative?

Decades of PC primed people to obey, for the day they would roll up their sleeves.
Me Too diverted from Epstein’s arrest, whose science proved central to the Covid plot.
One of Lenin’s first visits was to Ivan Pavlov, to apply his conditioning to the masses.

See also:
Tasting Uncertainty; Learning To Love Doubt - Why managed outcomes in politics and companies are killing creativity (Aug 12, 2021)
The Never Normal is Forever - UK Gov aims to embed control through 'new identities' (Sep 07, 2021)

(2,000 words or about 10 minutes of your time.)

Nov 4, 2022

Reaction to The Atlantic article calling for a “pandemic amnesty” has met with a resounding, “No!”

The economist Emily Oster teaches a class at Brown University — on COVID. If she's using the students to scout out new excuses, it is not working and is duplicitious on many levels.

Oster’s tone is defensive: she concedes no ground to doctors or scientists who were right; nor to individuals who applied common sense.

“In some instances, the right people were right for the wrong reasons. In other instances, they had a prescient understanding of the available information.”

In other words, you were right by accident, or you flipped a coin.

She deploys the now-familiar defence that “we” were grappling with unknowns, and that most people had good intent — except for those pushing misinformation. Yet any doctor or scientist who tried to raise questions was accused of misinformation.

She claims the dilemma, as injections rolled out, was whether to take Moderna or Johnson & Johnson. Yet she ignores the decades of evidence that Coronavirus vaccines don’t work and may even be harmful. Any doctor who pointed that out risked being stripped of their licence to practice.

She admits masks and social distancing did not work “But the thing is: We didn’t know.” (her emphasis). Yet any doctor or scientist who offered evidence was censored — even as Anthony Fauci and the World Health Organization flip-flopped.

Pupils were masked while teachers were often unmasked; schools complied in the U.S. because the government paid $200 billion on condition that they enforced a set of behaviours. They weren’t following the science, they were following the money. [1]

“The people who got it right, for whatever reason, may want to gloat.”

Really? We who could not comfort our grandparents as they died — I was stranded in another country as my grandfather, the son of a doctor, never vaccinated, passed away at the age of 103. A living antidote to the travesty that is modern medicine. I would have liked to have kissed him goodbye.

Our children are traumatised and physically and emotionally damaged. The fall in mental acuity may be invisible to the high school dropout Bill Gates, but he has projected his incapacity on more able individuals.

Never in the field of human conflict was so much stolen from so many by so few — from the able by the inadequates.

We who refused deployed common sense and had to witness our loved ones sucumb to panic whipped up by the media. We tried to stay rational while dervishes spun their minds.

The Atlantic may be testing the water, taking the temperature of public anger, but it does not concede that people who resisted the mandates were correct. Thus it does not acknowledge the principle of consent; of personal rights including bodily integrity, the essence of property. It does not admit natural immunity.

Did Emily Oster even write the article at her own initiative? The Atlantic is owned by Steve Jobs’ widow and is an extension of the military, pharma, fintech complex that is behind the injectables. For nearly three years The Atlantic has called for the unvaccinated to be fired, barred from travel, accused them of failing to believe in the Common Good, and guilty, even, of human sacrifice. [2]

Many readers will be aware of the interlocking projects that were advanced as the pandemic unfolded: ID2020 and the billions that were poured into Track and Trace; central bank digital currency; new leglislation that overturned rights ingrained in Common Law; the weaponization of every public institution, from hospitals, to churches and schools; the inculcation of social credit scores through behavioural psychology; the media put on a wartime footing with unprecedented propaganda and censorship, the state and corporations acting in lockstep.

These projects are all discussed publicly by the Rockefellers and linked foundations, institutes and think tanks.

Yet many people are still not aware of these projects. They were overwhelmed by the body count on the television screen or the newspaper masthead, a toll that no longer reset, as before, with each new year but compounded, ratcheting ever higher, blurring “with Covid” and “from Covid,” as the common flu disappeared, mired in a toxic brew of fear.

Witchery was a term the cultist Charles Manson used, akin to spooking and gaslighting individuals. Oster's article was published on Oct 31, as befits her tone of witchery:

“The standard saying is that those who forget history are doomed to repeat it. But dwelling on the mistakes of history can lead to a repetitive doom loop as well. Let’s acknowledge that we made complicated choices in the face of deep uncertainty, and then try to work together to build back and move forward.”

Don’t dwell on your loss, she says. Move on. Build back... better.

She does not deserve a Greta-style “how dare you!” Her tone is too offensive for such repartee, but Oster may not be fully conscious of the impact her words have on others, for she is locked in a cult.

PC is Pavlovian

It turns out that Political Correctness is not about politics, it is social control. Just as the pandemic was never about medical science but behavioural psychology.

A central pillar of social control is getting people not to ask questions; to comply passively for the Common Good.

One of Lenin’s first visits, on arriving in Russia from Switzerland, was to Ivan Pavlov, to see what he could apply from the physiologist’s conditioning of dogs to the Russian people.

I always knew that office managers welcomed PC because it shielded them from criticism; but I made the mistake of seeing PC as ideological, because politics is one of my interests. For the majority of people, who don’t think about politics, it’s just “being polite” and respectful to others: many accept PC without question precisely because it does not seem political.

Decades of PC left people primed to obey, ready for when they would be told to roll up their sleeves.

This kind of cult thinking is “Covidian” but it’s not uniform. There is a bunch of cults — one in the civil service, one in science, another among educators. If the sexualization underway in kindergartens is not a cult, then the word has lost all meaning.

Although each has its ritual — and every cult is predicated on the idea that its adherents are in possession of the real truth — they work together to make the world safe for cults.

The Environmental, Social and Governance acts an umbrella, bringing them all together under one roof of cults. Even the corporations put the cult before profit: the very definition of Woke.

That's what makes the plea for a Pandemic Amnesty so weird. Of course they want to cover their backsides individually, but as members of the cult they must be patting themselves on the back. The victims are the PC masses, who are also members of the cult but on a lower rung, so to speak.

Some will comply, just to see their relatives once again. Others will be grateful for a temporary respite from the lockdown. That’s where we are now. The restrictions on freedoms, the extension of government power, the executive orders and diktats remain in place, just out of sight, like the police with their truncheons. They are leaving the door open to do it again, which is a real abuser tactic.

They relax the rules for a while and those in thrall to Stockholm syndrome love them all the more — cult leader or prison warder, it's the same. That is why the call for an amnesty is just another attempt to gaslight us into shutting up and complying.

Common sense would have it that, if people’s experience diverged from what they were told, they would question the narrrative babbling from the box in the corner. But then there’s the adage, “Who are you going to believe: the government or your lying eyes.”

The virus is psychological

The beauty of Covid as concept is that it merges lived experience with the official narrative. The symptoms of the virus are the same as the side effects of the vaccine. Most of the public doesn’t notice that the harm is done by the protection.

This strengthens the contention that the virus is as much psychological as real, as fellow Substack author Freedom Fox writes:

“Doctor of psychology Sigmund Freud was the expert, not Dr of biology Jonas Salk. Masks, social distancing, lockdowns, quarantines, contact tracing, testing, nonstop propaganda and censorship from media, tech, business, professional regulators, academia, entertainment, from every layer of society. All coordinated globally but with epicenters of control and leadership in the US and UK.
They blew right through all ethical considerations contained in pre-pandemic plans and practices — Western liberal democratic values discarded. When they saw how effective the Goebbels model of information control was at controlling populations they decided to not let the crisis opportunity go to waste.” ]3]

The public still needed a scapegoat:

“The real enemy then is humanity itself.” — The First Global Revolution, Club of Rome (1993).

The Common Good fits the bill, enabled by Political Correctness, allowing for the replacement of Common Law rights by human rights contingent upon international treaty.

Oster displays cult behaviour, yet her cover or pitch is that the public at large will swallow more of the same: if the masses cannot see the deception, then Oster’s plea to post-democide Kumbayah will fly.

The film Logan’s Run (1976) comes to mind. Everyone must undergo the rite of “Carrousel” when they reach the age of 30. Producer George Pal described making the movie as “development hell” according to Wikipedia — which offers little insight — but it was taken over by Soylent Green author Stanley Greenberg under Saul David. Apparently they raised the age of death from 21 to 30 only because of a shortage of actors.

The next one

The Dossier, on Substack, has unearthed audio scrubbed from the public record of Event 201 in Oct 2019. [4]

In it Tom Inglesby, the director of the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, says the name 201 comes from the “200 epidemic events already straining resources” — 201 is the lode stone.

Observe that the Inglesby quote comes from Jan 2019 when he was promoting Event 201. Quite some foresight, or “prescient” as Emily Oster calls it. He would go on to be a senior adviser in the Biden White House. The first person to retweet the announcement was Ron Klain, who would later become the Biden White House chief of staff.

Cass Sunstein was the author of “Nudge,” that has been adopted as the mechanism of outcomes management worldwide, including Britain’s Nudge Unit that inveigles the public to do what government wants them to do.

The British communist Susan Michie is the lead on this project, as the most influential member of the UK Government’s Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE).

See Moneycircus, Sep 2021 — The Never Normal is Forever: UK Gov aims to Embed Control through 'New Identities'

The rabbit hole runs deep, as Freedom Fox notes:

“As Wellcome Trust created Wellcome LEAP in 2018, a global health DARPA. Headed by a former DARPA leader with senior Big Tech experience. Regina Dugan. DARPA is known for leading advanced PsyOps campaigns internationally and within the U.S..”

This plot is covered — friends “running interference” — from unexpected directions. The “Me Too” actress movement emerged to co-incide with the first prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein in 2005, whose science blackmail unit proved central to the Covid plot.

It was also remarkable how quickly it disappeared from the headlines at the same time as Epstein.

No accountability: no good

It boils down to the argument about consent. Those raising a finger to the cult know that it has no right to make these demands; yet those who comply already see themselves as slaves, captured by the cult. Even if they hold out for a while in their hearts they don’t believe they have a right to say no.

It also comes down to accountability, without which no government is good. Appealing to the Common Good is no substitute for government, for it implies no accountability. And that we cannot allow.

Moneycircus