Crisis Update: United Nations Land Grab

First nations used as proxies by oligarchs

• Property rights are being undermined by UNDRIP programme – for everyone

• By definition, if rights are no longer sacred, no-one owns anything

• Today’s aboriginals could be dispossessed by future historical discoveries

• Sustainable Development Goals raise financial and admin burden of ownership

• Net Zero carbon rules may be tweaked to make cost to first nations unsustainable

• Record of weapons testing and bio warfare on minorities does not bode trust

• King Charles and colonialists had the gall to personally launch The Great Reset

• Rockefeller-funded UN can be regarded as no less than their tool

• The same body that targets minorities for “equitable” access to the clot shot

See also Australia: Military, Minerals And Mining: Northern Territory is central to The Plan (Moneycircus, Nov 21, 2021)

Aboriginal Peoples Resist: Binjari, Rockhole clearances; monetizing diversity; Botswana's new variant (Nov 25, 2021)

(About 2,400 words or 12 minutes of your company. Substack’s search sucks. Use Google as site:moneycircus.substack.com followed by term, or use the second magnifying glass on homepage.)

Jun 2, 2023

The chief target of WW1 was not France, Belgium or Germany. The target was the Ottoman empire, known as “the sick man of Europe.” In particular, its control of Palestine would be wrested in order create space for Israel.

A key outcome of WW2 was was not only the deaths of millions on the battlefield, but also the exhaustion of Europe and the loss of its colonies.

WW3 will likewise be not about Ukraine but the opportunity an escalated war offers to redistribute resources in countries far away from the apparent front line — not only in Africa but, if you will confront the nightmare, in Canada, Australasia and perhaps even in the U.S..

What, you ask, could be the method or purpose? Forget motive, for that leads to speculation.

We already witness the people under attack, especially in the above-mentioned nations, economically, through the constraint of food and fuel, and from a medical bio threat — your opinion of where it came from and why is not necessary to acknowledge the current rate of excess mortality.

The most high-profile mechanisms to seize privately-owned land include the expropriation of farmers in the Netherlands and through the United Nations’ promotion of indigenous rights, especially in what is sometimes called the new world.

Dutch farmers are being bought out with the offer of a cash payment so long as they agree to give up farming entirely. If they refuse, in areas designated for rewilding, their farms will be seized by force. Rewilding is worldwide, from Britain to Sri Lanka.

Transfer

The transfer of ownership rights to indigenous people goes by the name of “Land Back,” and the return to the “original stewards” of alienated property.

Arguments for restitution include that colonists and crown representatives had no right to sell aboriginal lands, and that deeds of ownership are therefore invalid. Curiously, while there is talk of reparations no-one is asking the royal families of Europe to return their rapine proceeds.

King Charles III had the gall to front The Great Reset in Jun 2020, flaunting the trillions in wealth under asset management that he says will reshape the world order.

For the less engaged, the musician Bono is the populist face of this heist. Rolling Stone: “See Paul McCartney, Bono, Pharrell Urge Action on Climate Change.” [1]

In an odd parallel, the author attended a U2 concert in Dublin in 1997, the weekend that Princess Diana was killed, one year after her divorce from Charles. Like Diana, U2 had been shoehorned into top billing, being thought safely non-political. Diana surprised us. Bono is forever chained to his slavery.

The bodies involved in restitution or expropriation include the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues and the U.S. Agency for International Development. The key policy is the crudely named UNDRIP - United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. It says:

Article 25:
Indigenous peoples have the right to maintain and strengthen their distinctive spiritual relationship with their traditionally owned or otherwise occupied and used lands, territories, waters and coastal seas and other resources and to uphold their responsibilities to future generations in this regard

Article 26:
Indigenous peoples have the right to the lands, territories and resources which they have traditionally owned, occupied or otherwise used or acquired.
2. Indigenous peoples have the right to own, use, develop and control the lands, territories and resources that they possess by reason of traditional ownership or other traditional occupation or use, as well as those which they have otherwise acquired

One must first of all resist any attempt to divide people in order to conquer them. One must say up front that there is no certainty that indigenous peoples will acquire ancestral lands — nor that they would be allowed to retain control.

Bear in mind that right is not the same as utility or practical ability. Under climate policies, including Net Zero, any asset that is used or exploited in any way is subject to carbon taxes, rationing and Sustainable Development Goals. These are at once complex and ill-defined, requiring costly teams of specialists and of course lawyers that would perhaps be beyond the reach of indigenous clans.

To jump to a possible conclusion, indigenous peoples may discover that they are being used as a lever to seize land, to redistribute resources, in a way that does not ultimately benefit them.

Article 5:
Indigenous peoples have the right to maintain and strengthen their distinct political, legal, economic, social and cultural institutions, while retaining their right to participate fully, if they so choose, in the political, economic, social and cultural life of the State.

Do you even believe that after three years of the Covid response? When “the end of abundance” has been declared by president Emmanuel Macron? When liberties have been trampled for “the greater good.” Let alone, after decades in which the oligarchs have used native lands for weapons testing and ethnic minorities for medical experiments like Tuskegee? [2]

Justice

Another reason to question such an objective is that ethnic minorities and indigenous peoples were specifically targeted during the Covid response.

Under the guise of equity — because it's not fair to deny them the nutritous shot — they were injured or killed in outsize numbers according to Dr Charles Hoffe, who was in turn fact checked by Reuters. [3]

As we wrote in August 2021:

“Justisss, justisss, so shall… justisss and equiteee prevail”. The Weird Sisters of Shakespeare's Macbeth push at the Black people and the Roma, hustling them to the front of the queue. The fiendish doctors, depraved psychologists, warped academics, venal teachers, corrupt civil servants and mendacious journalists — for it is people like us — forming a sibilant coven of public assassins, dripping with lies.

See Evil Has Its Day: so shall justice (Moneycircus, Aug 21, 2021)

Macleans magazine had an article from 1956 - “The Rothschilds' Fabulous Stake In Canada.” It has been 404’d or memory-holed and deleted from the prestigious magazine but you can find it for now on the Internet Archive.

This is who controls land. Unlike wealthy private owners, indigenous territories will not go to individuals but to community organisations, who could be dispossessed by future UN declarations or force majeure (climate emergency).