Crisis Update: Gaza's Fate Holds A Warning

Brutal parallel with other land grabs

• Seems increasingly likely that Gaza is part of the UN agenda

• Israeli people do not trust what officials are telling them

• U.S. and EU entities responding with remarkably unified censorship

• Lock step global support for Israel betrays hidden boot

• Gaza looks more like a land grab; policies similar to Maui fires

• You think there isn't already a SMART city blueprint for Gaza’s Khan Younis?

• Israel gov taking charge of land use, planning and construction

• Anti-settler groups condemn Feb 2023 annexation of West Bank

• Alignment with globalist interests falls into place; war a means to an end

• The Oct 7th stand down is political suicide, and suggests leadership is directed

• Colonial interests have Israel in play, just as elsewhere

• Censorship and surveillance accelerates, and war is the perfect excuse

• First casualty always is truth; followed by the people they purport to protect

• Duty of rational people is to call for calm and a considered response

• Only then can we begin to address the real enemy

Sorry, friends for the delay since the last article: the need for accuracy is overwhelming.
See also:
'Beheaded Babies' Is A Century-Old Trope (Oct 12, 2023)
Gaza, An Open And Closed Case (Oct, 10, 2023)
Israel-Gaza Clash Is More Than Bad Neighbours (Oct 8, 2023)
Churchill’s Wars And Financial Ties (May 18, 2023)
Georgia Warns U.S.-Backed Groups Plotting Unrest - Economic interests seeking control of land to reshape energy routes (Oct 4, 2023)
Tragedy As Armenians Flee Karabakh (Sep 26, 2023)
‘Climate Emergency’ Would Be Step Closer To Dictatorship (Sep 21, 2023)
Georgia's Colourful Riot Not Yet Revolution (Mar 8, 2023)
Europe, Gas And The Endgame - Switching the energy axis from East-West, to South-North (Sep 30, 2022)
Eurasia note #60 – Armenia and Azerbaijan (Sep 23, 2022)
Azerbaijan Hits Armenia With Turkish Drones (Sep 13, 2022)

(Words: 3,000 or about 14 minutes of your company.)

Gaza’s telecoms knocked out - by Mohammed Talatene

Oct 16, 2023

The reality is dawning on Israelis that the government response to the attack from Gaza, is not what it seems.

Trust has imploded.

A poll from the Walla news site finds that almost all Israelis — 94 per cent — hold their government responsible for the collapse of the defence systems in the southern settlements. [1]

Some Israelis reflect the disgust, pleading to fellow citizens to "ask if what you see around you aligns with your values." [2]

Even darker evidence emerges as to who, exactly, pulled the trigger on some of those who died.

Do not fixate on who or what allowed the attack to happen. Because like all terror "happenings" there is a lot of confusion; some of it deliberate, in order to shield the authorities.

The darkest cloud hanging over these events is the uniformity of the international response:

• Governments are stacked like incoming planes behind Israel, while most of the rest sit on their hands.

• Police move as one to quash support for Palestine and criticism of Israel, storming a synagogue where orthodox Jews expressed solidarity.

• Media speak in unison. Whenever you see the unified message, you know there is money behind it.

Why? Because media exposure costs millions. Journalists don't speak with one voice because they are of one mind. They don't have a mind. They are paid and scripted.

A rapid response: coordinated at government level; a unified line broadcast through the media; enforced by police.

Humans are a fractious bunch. Think of friends around a table: we rarely agree, we delight in argument — why are governments in lock step? It is the coordination that gives the game away.

Petri dish

Prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu admitted turning the country in to a laboratory for Pfizer.

The outrage of Oct 7th has understandably diverted the attention of some leading critics of the Covid response. Yet the effects of the Covid shots are growing. A significant minority of people is waking up.

Evidence includes the low acceptance of the latest vaccine. Just two per cent of eligible people have taken the updated Covid booster shot in the United States. Pfizer last week slashed forecasts for sales of its new Covid treatments by $9 billion, and today its shares fell with those of its co-conspirator BioNTech. [3]

People are waking up to the criminal nature of the Covid response. Governments need a distraction, or an excuse, to re-impose arbitrary laws that are still "on the books" and perhaps to suspend elections or avoid accountability in other ways. Politicians and more importantly bureaucrats, the public "servants" who implemented the Covid measures, would not survive a genuine change of rule.

They sold out the people to corporations and big money foundations using the United Nations and World Heath Organisation as a cloak to implement profiteering and a huge transfer of wealth to the richest.

War has, furthermore, been used throughout history to alter society.

The Medicare and Social Security, and their equivalent in many other countries, are close to insolvent. That is on course in the U.S. by 2026 and 2033, respectively. Hence the effort by the corporations that coalesce in the World Economic Forum and their intergovernmental mechanism the United Nations, to accelerate Agenda 2030 to 2025.

There are two options: to try to fix a society which is financially and spiritually bankrupt; the other is to burn it down and build back better (BBB). Western politicians and officials are captured by interests who favour the latter.

The pretext is always the same set of "cascading crises": Climate Change - now "global boiling" - which the United Nations blames for a water shortage that curiously coincides with a shortage of fertiliser. Or the "wildfires" that burned out the native residents of Maui.

Don't fret about the cause. Look only at the response.

Moving to the next stage of war is totally consistent with the subversion of society: depopulation, the massive transfer of wealth to the rich during Covid and conflict, the land grab under the pretext of Climate Change, and the ideological push by Communitarians to pull down national borders and create the "new international order" of which the politicians and their owners speak.

Where war happens, and for what reason, is largely determined by the owner-investors: it is designed to push competitors out of the market (like the Russian and Ottoman empires in WWI), or to get their hands on land and resources (Palestine in WWI and WW2).

The owner-investors see the people as an expense, and expendable. Their point of view is that of colonialist or plantation owner.

Under various iterations of Build Back Better (or the Great Reset/ Great Shutdown) there are more workers than required. The natives are to be cleared off the most productive or valuable land — as happened in the 19th century and is happening again — to be enclosed in 15 minute cities. The excess population is to be reduced.

For goodness sake, think of ghettoes. But this time involuntary.

We see such experiments in cities like London, under the pretext of Ultra Low Emission Zones. Farmers are told to cut back or close down because of "too much" nitrogen or carbon, in the Netherlands and Sri Lanka, and many other countries. The result, of course, will be not enough food.

The native inhabitants are being persuaded to give up their land. After the native Hawaiians were burned out from some of the most expensive real estate in the United States, in Lahaina, Maui, it is being made very hard for them to regain access to their land, or maybe even to retain ownership.

The press has suggested that Hawaiians should relocate to Nevada, where there is a diaspora of their people. Palestinians in Gaza are, by some accounts, to be offered small homes in the Sinai.

Desert home

As veteran Mid East reporter Jonathan Cook wrote in 2015 there have long been suggestions in Arab and Israeli media that Egypt's installed president Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, would allot 1,600 sq km of territory in Sinai to resettle Gazans. [4]

Similarly, the desire of Israeli leaders to re-settle the land is no secret.

Prime minister Levi Eshkol said in 1967: "We'll deprive Gaza of water, and the Arabs will leave...I want them all to go, even if they go to the moon."

PM Yitzhak Rabin said in 1992: "I would like Gaza to sink into the sea."

Just before the fires in Maui, the state government announced plans to take control of all redevelopment in the event of a natural disaster. After the fire governor Josh Green said he might declare Lahaina a national park, relocating residents elsewhere.

Parallel threats

In Feb 2023, Israel's finance minster, and head of the Defense Ministry’s new Settlements Administration, Bezalel Smotrich was given authority to allocate land, and authority over planning and construction, over the West Bank.

Michael Sfard, writing in Foreign Policy, said Israel was de jure annexing the West Bank, taken in 1967 from Jordan, in violation of international law, by transferring control from the military to civilian government. [5]

Roni Pelli wrote in the journal #972: Smotrich did not proclaim, "in his most militant tone, that he would be crushing Israeli democracy. Smotrich seems to understand that effective action, particularly when it comes to the settlement enterprise, is done quietly and behind the scenes." [6]

Quietly and behind the scenes — because that is how Agenda 21, the SMART city prisons, and the corporate capture of officialdom works. [7]

Under the Smotrich plan, Israelis would take full control of the West Bank, giving Palestinians the option to live under Israeli rule, or to leave. Something perhaps similar to the Haavara, or Transfer, Agreement for Jews to leave Germany in the 1930s and 40s, as described by the historian Edwin Black.

The Israeli supreme Court has struck down attempts to compulsorily purchase Palestinian homes. So in July the government tried to bring the legal system under political control, leading to widespread protests.

Hand of human

For Israel to become the divinely appointed home of the Jews it would have to be divinely created - and yet it is the work of man. This is one of many tensions at the heart of Israel, and the reason that devoutly religious Jews reject the State.

Before Israel's "right to exist" existed, it had to be commanded into being. This was the command of rich and powerful men, in a far off country, re-apportioning someone else's land. Zionism is thus a version of colonialism.

This is a telling sign of its origin and character in the European imperial project, most evidently, the British, as we wrote in the last article.

Alfred Lord Milner drafted the Balfour Declaration that extracted from Britain the promise of a future Israel. Milner's Round Table was run by British political dynasty the Cecils, and banking dynasty the Rothschilds, who financed Cecil Rhodes (coincidental first name) and his scholarship — as well as the Churchill family.

See: 'Beheaded Babies' Is A Century-Old Trope (Oct 12, 2023)

See Churchill’s Wars And Financial Ties (May 18, 2023)

It is likely that neither Netanyahu nor Smotrich is taking decisions. Their action - or lack of it in the case of the stand-down of October 7th - is simply too audacious, and they stand to reap the smallest part of the benefit - the whirlwind not the harvest.

The legacy press implies that Netanyahu's new stature as leader-in-wartime will burnish his image - but opinion polls speak overwhelmingly of the opposite.

It is likely that he has sacrificed his popularity on this issue, as did so many politicians on the altar of the Covid vaccine - Jacinda Ardern in New Zealand, Dan Andrews in Victoria, Australia, and U.S. bureaucrats like Dr Anthony Fauci - after imposing policies that far exceeded accountability to the public.

They were answering to somebody else. Once again, the clue is in the response.

There are at least two sides to every story. If the media, acting in unison around the world, promotes only one side, you know they are not "speaking truth to power" — they are conniving with power.

The indefatigable Norman Finkelstein goes further: Gaza cannot attack the state of Israel because Gaza and the West Bank are part of the State of Israel. "What we witnessed was a slave revolt."

"They [Zionists] carry on like Mongol hordes — that's what they are."

Norm playfully references Khazarian Eurasians without using the word. And that is not a cheap shot: the interest and loyalty of Eurasians is self-describing. [8]

Digital Censorship

Truth does not require censorship, yet the muzzling and sanitizing of the public record accelerates.

Propaganda and censorship is increasingly centralised. It goes far beyond the army censor's blue pencil of old.

The European Commission, an unelected body of bureaucrats who run the European Union, wants to turn all social media into mass surveillance tools so that digital communications of all EU citizens, including their live conversations, photos and videos, can be automatically scanned for criminal offences.

Commissioners have over-ridden the warnings of academics, lawyers and civil liberties advocates. They ignore the mounting evidence that AI cannot screen for pre-crime or Orwell’s “Thoughtcrime” without falsely accusing many people. There is not even majority support among European politicians — so the Commission did an end run around the majority opinion and unleashed an advertising blitz, predictably claiming it aims to stop child abuse.

Those advertisements excluded people who care about privacy, such as those who discuss Julian Assange or Edward Snowden, or populist parties, or religion. The EC was seeking to build a wedge of support, an uncritical echo chamber, to leverage its surveillance plans.

After the innovation and technology expert Danny Mekić @DannyMekic wrote a topic on European digital surveillance for the Dutch newspaper de Volkskrant, he was censored, at least temporarily, by Twitter/X. [9]

Which makes you think: for whom does the European Commission work?

The people who desire — and own patents for — Digital ID to encompass everything a person does are the bankers, fronted by the Gates and Rockefeller foundations, and a constellation of corporations owned by billionaires like Germany's Quandt family who own the technology to make it happen.

If bureaucracy, politicians, the media and corporations constitute a monolith, society is in a very dangerous place.