Crisis Update: Bin Laden Cameo Role In Gaza Mind War

West's triple bluff hides its desire for regional conflict beyond Israel

• West appears to lose the information war over Israel in Gaza

• Media flips out as Bin Laden goes viral on TikTok…

• But is a feint to justify more stringent censorship?

• Noise and outrage obscures the complex manipulation of narrative

• The people are not to see the link of Covid, climate, conflict and currency

• Or that they were shot before even the people of Gaza

• West does not ‘stand with Israel’ so much as it needs a pretext…

• for land and resource grabs that provide a fresh infusion or reset

• All are party to such a conflict — for there are no bystanders

• Uncensored images of slaughtered women and children appeal to baser instincts

• Faith in humanitarian law collapses amid double standards

• UN cannot even negotiate a temporary ceasefire. Result: demoralization

• Zionism reaches far beyond Israel: it is the colonial project

• Gaza conflict is the West’s centuries-long struggle to dominate the Global South

• Which will become clear if and when it escalates into regional war

(2,100 words or 10 minutes of your company).

Still playing a role in Western narrative formation after all these years

Nov 16, 2023

The overseers have a problem, at least, superficially. The youth are not supporting the slaughter in Gaza.

The establishment has educated at least one generation of students in “social justice” and critical race theory. Now the ADL is fretting that only 32 per cent of Americans “stand with Israel” and youth are proceeding as they’ve been taught: to see through the lens of oppressor/oppressed, white and brown.

Billionaires are yanking their endowments from universities and decry — with some justification — the language of the campus.

There are signs, however, of a narrative within a narrative: the people are being deliberately exposed to the brutality of Gaza; genocide is not collateral damage but rather the objective; for finance capital and the West is in crisis, and the way it escapes periodically is to seize the land and assets of others, in a historical practice that in the West goes back more than 600 years.

There must be rows of desk soldiers leveraging their degrees in journalism and creative writing to disguise this.

Dysfunction or intent

The latest storm in a teacup is that Gen Z, or Zoomers, are sharing Osama Bin Laden (OBL)’s “Letter to America” written a year after September 11^th, 2001. OBL pithily describes the West’s hegemony over the Global South in terms that 20-somethings would recognize from their post-colonial studies at college.

Fearing an avalanche — or so the uber-narrative would have it — Zionists are freaking out as the Overton Window shifts. The Guardian newspaper went full Orwell and deleted the letter that has lain on its site for 21 years, now that it no longer suits the establishment narrative.

Of course it’s not really hidden, because it’s on the Internet Archive. [1] It cites Palestine as a principal reason for his opposition to the West. But the TikTok coverage does not penetrate OBL’s ideas more than superficially. [2]

Thus it is not a threat to the Ssecurity states of the West; rather it is a public-facing matter of manufacturing consent.

The OBL letter was never authenticated by a voice recording, for what that’s worth. Indeed the “Letter to America” is less important than Bin Ladin's September 28, 2001 interview with Ummat, which took place immediately following the World Trade Center bombings. [3]

There is another letter from OBL (PDF), that explores the workings of finance capital in relation to Western hegemony, written during the Obama presidency. But if you believe, as some do, that Bin Laden died in the early 2000s, then this second letter, at least, is a forgery... part of the glorious dialectic. [4]

What’s going on? A move towards greater censorship, perhaps. TikTok is where many people post images of the cruel happenings in Israel and Gaza, and who better to spark a clampdown than OBL himself?

Who would be some of the big name investors in TikTok’s owner ByteDance but Sequoia Capital, the Carlyle Group, BlackRock, and Kohlberg, Kravis and Roberts.

If this is information control, it’s as sloppy as the Israel Defense Forces’ videos from Oct 7, which appear to confirm what we suspected: that many if not most of the casualties were the result of crossfire — if not deliberate destruction of hostages alongside militants under the Hannibal doctrine.

We understand this is the last thing Israelis want to hear, as their relatives are being called up to fight. But government have never cared about their citizens when they decide to continue politics by other means.

Censorship of anything to do with Nine Eleven, by the way, only makes people more curious about the perpetrators. The FBI admits it has no evidence linking OBL with the bombing of the World Trade Center in 2001.

Consistent analysis

The teaching of history and philosophy has been replaced by critical race theory, intersectionality, and diversity, equity and inclusivity (DEI) which dices people by caste, allowing the privileged to perceive almost anything as a micro-aggression.

Billionaire donations promote sectarian fields of research. Even in high schools, where February is Black History Month, black pupils berate their white colleagues from the school stage.

Not one of these billionaire donors suggested blacklisting graduates, denying them internships or job offers when those same students explored white-on-brown violence, or called for reparations for slavery and restitution for past sleights.

To be sure, some statements out of the universities seem provocative. Thirty student groups at Harvard University demand to hold “the Israeli regime entirely responsible for all unfolding violence.”

A Cornell professor called the slaughter of Oct 7 “exhilarating.”

Paradoxically, the rhetoric of students and faculty has not changed. Have donors decided suddenly that oppressed-oppressor rhetoric no longer applies? To put it another way, billionaires promoted racism when they had the power to root it out.

Congruent motive

If the billionaires’ outrage is fake or misconstrued, what might be their underlying objective?

Social media companies which usually censor gore have allowed the most bloody imagery from the bombing of Gaza to circulate without limit. We have noted that this parade of brutality upon women and children is no accident, just as it cannot be called collateral damage.

If the objective is to desensitize the viewer, to normalise genocide, does it fit with anything else we observe?

Why, yes: the synergy of the Coof shot, the resulting excess death and disability; the sterilisation of the transgender business; the post-human world envisaged by transhumanists; the open borders and resettlement of populations; the “global boiling,” the “wildfires” and the land grabs afflicting the choicest real estate around the globe.

These same billionaire “philanthropists” have promoted — through a different route but with a strangely parallel outcome — an assault upon human life as we know it: undermining family and roles; filling children with anxiety about colour, sex and their place in society; subverting schools and education for well over a decade. They support the transgender experiment — which is not a grassroots movement but a billionaire-funded exercise in castration. They support the various strands of transhumanism, which are demonic fantasies of a post-human world.

What devilish consistency!

Emotional blackmail

Through a deliberate inversion, much of the Alt Media that exposed the corporate cartel, the manufacture of the gender dysphoria industry, pushing men upon women’s sports, just as they pushed the “vaccine” — those influencers cannot see the same interests manufacturing a conflict in the Mid East.

Not only do they have a peculiar, nay suspicious, blind spot; they suddenly support those interests: “Silence is violence,” they shout if you do not condemn Palestinians with sufficient vigour. A considered stance is not enough.

They call you disgraceful but never say why: they attack with emotion, not intellect, leaving you no way to respond.

During Black Lives Matter protests you had to support defunding the police; now black deaths are rising. After Nine Eleven, only one Congress member opposed the Patriot Act; years later many concede it was a power grab.

The media is just as immoral as its corporate patrons. They don’t want you to notice. Those billionaires would have you believe they are against genocide, and yet they supported the Covid response, forcing vaccine mandates — which are still in place in some universities.

They distract you by reducing the debate, as they did after Nine Eleven, to “They hate us for our freedoms” — and the same rallying cry is being used today. See Congressional candidate in Florida, Laura Loomer, in a 90-minute debate with David Miller, here [5]

One must be clear: a person who shouts “Palestine for the Palestinians,” but who does not address what then happens to Israelis, is equally closed-minded. It is no different to saying “just wipe them out,” as some have said of Palestinians since Oct 7.

The state corporate media highlights only these extremes, and presents them as polar opposites when they express the same intent: genocide.