Chronicle of Dissent: Bloody Thoughts

The people against the 'elites' and other psychiatric patients

Feb 22, 2022

As Canada hits a brick wall, time to reassess the fools, angels and demons.
Media purveys blind faith that a greater intelligence is poised to save us.
There is no evidence of intent nor capacity to turn things around.
Enemy is not just the psychotic elite but our own blind mass.
What’s the nature of The Great Reset and why is it hidden?

See also Moneycircus, Jan 2, 2022 — The Great Reset As Subversion: A KGB defector warned us about crisis tactics decades ago

Feb 22, 2022

People witness tyranny in tooth and claw. That stench is desperation. They can smell its fetid breath.

If not cornered already the beast is lashing out. If it reacts like this to the first sustained resistance, there must be some deeper impulse.

And then there's the war. The two sides deny they want it. Onlookers say it's inevitable.

But who are these streetwalkers urging two neighbors to fight. They are the presstitutes and governments who are having trouble at home. Complication from the jabs, food shortages and price rises. The people grow restive.

Just as the scale of overreaction to the truckers reveals their hand, the governments telegraph that they cannot afford to lose.

They are urgent to keep squirting vaccines in some countries while others relax restrictions. Biden's problems mount as ratings fall. With every passing day the interests of those who benefit from further dislocation intersect.

Poor elites

If not now, then when do we act? That goes for both sides, the self described elites, and us.

It's rather late for denial and assertion. The would-be elite have their interests, we have ours, as Ngaire Woods told the WEF's Great Narrative.

Separate projects are coming together:

the mass injections and consequences;
resulting mass unrest - the brutal response at the first signs of protest;
economic disruption and food shortages;
provocation of Russia and hacking narratives that imply electricity blackouts;
financial crisis and consequences of money printing;
monetary reset and more.

This horrible beauty is too much even for many hard-bitten political scribes because it extends far beyond any paradigm: it is not a 2D, red-blue polarity but a 3D sphere of neuron-like connections. Or as Ned Beatty put it in Paddy Chayefsky's Network (1976):

"... one holistic system of systems, one vast and immane, interwoven, interacting, multivariate, multinational dominion... one vast and ecumenical holding company."

For two years the Reset, was a conspiracy theory. Now the World Economic Forum itself is vanishing before our eyes. Its Young Global Leaders are not to be disturbed in their work. And if they are, then — "Beam me up, Scotty" — others will slide into their place until the attention dies down.

As recently as Aug 2021 the BBC said there were some books called Reset but they'd been "hijacked" by theories. Talk of an alleged takeover by the elites is “implausible,” said The Guardian just over a year ago.

Open networks

Could vested interests coincide. Could such a display of peacock's feather have single tail? Who are these cawing birds?

At first the WEF appeared in the shadows but later it spread like a spider's web. Once you looked closely, it had networks like a country club, tennis or yacht club, or friends of the theatre — the same patrons popped up again and again.

WEF hosted the pharma executives that in Davos discussed the plan to use vaccination within the rollout of the Reset. Evidence lies in the fact that WEF is a founder member or partner of the bodies built around the WHO to drive Event Covid.

NGOs actually complained that they were squeezed out of their habitat, the corridors and meeting rooms of the UN, where charities go to find work. [1]

Gavi's Geneva HQ is a cuckoo's nest next to the WHO from where Bill Gates funds much of its budget, and influences the WHO's work.

This is Switzerland, the WEF’s stomping ground. But the WEF is not just a neighbor, is in the room.

TGR and Event Covid are not the only drills going live. The World Bank holds influence over developing countries, the IMF over borrowers on all continents. The UN is the intermediary. Like the WEF the IMF is a top down hierarchy that disseminates instructions.

When David Rockefeller formed the Trilateral Commission in the early 1970s he used the UN, whose HQ stands on land he donated, to seed that policy among all governments. Thus the domination of the UN, of which the WEF now stands accused, was first of all a Rockefeller strategy.

Author on technocracy Patrick Wood explains that within a few years the Trilateral Commission dominated State Department and National Security Adviser appointments.

The WEF has filled the same role. Though it presents itself as a think tank, attendance is by invitation only. As Prof Richard Werner discovered, if Klaus Schwab doesn't like your opinions you don't return. He was stuck off the list of Young Global Leaders, its predecessor.

Young leaders include PMs Trudeau and Jacinda Ardern, and Angela Merkel was an early member.

Schwab boasted of Trudeau that “half of his cabinet, or even more than half, are actually Young Global Leaders of the Economic Forum.” [2]

If you even question the WEF connection, even as an MP in parliament, you are immediately silenced. When Colin Carrie MP asked for the cabinet members to be named, the speaker blocked the question. [3]

In the media, Schwab like Soros is subjected to a reverse Schopenhauer effect (an idea is ridiculed, violently opposed, then accepted as self-evident.) Our heroes are at first celebrated, then defended, finally their relevance, almost existence, is denied.

Psychiatric elite

I feel we keep hitting a brick wall while reaching out to people. The enemy is not the self-described elite.

The childish assumption of the media is that some greater intelligence is coming to save us — whether it's Bill and Elon or aliens. There is absolutely no evidence to support the narrative that an elite of any kind has the ability or will to turn things around. I don't think they are even trying. What we read is Potemkin scenery.

Most of the things truly wrong with society, the rich are complicit in or directly responsible for. The pollution, spillages, contamination, poisoning, over production, planned obsolescence and over consumption — they profit from it all and pay the press to cover it up. Such people cannot possibly save themselves, let alone the planet.

Anyone dumb enough to describe themselves as elite has signed their own psychiatric certificate.

Talking globalist

As Trudeau is considered a key spokesman for the WEF, let’s learn to talk global and parse Trudeau’s words. At the start of the pandemic, the PM said:

"Building back better means giving support to the most vulnerable while maintain our momentum on reaching the 2030 agenda for sustainable development and the SDGs.
"Canada is here to listen and to help. This pandemic has provided an opportunity for a reset. This is our chances to accelerate our pre-pandemic efforts to re-imagine economic systems that actually address global challenges like extreme poverty, inequality and Climate Change."

Twice he mentions supporting the disadvantaged. Is he really proposing to lift up the vulnerable and the poor? It sounds progressive until your realize it is contingent on reaching Agenda 2030 and the Sustainable Development Goals.

You saw that China and India rejected the sustainable energy targets in Glasgow’s COP26. Did you hear British-Canadian central banker Mark Carney’s Green Horizon speeches, in which he condemns “unsustainable” businesses to certain death. If companies cannot comply with sustainable reporting requirements — and pay their carbon taxes — they must close.

This is more than tough love. How do yo think such technocratic monomaniacs truly view the vulnerable and poor?

Next we hear Trudeau say, “Canada is here to listen and to help.” This statement in a vacuum lacks an object. It is interjected in the middle of a seemingly cogent argument but makes no sense. Unless it is code for Trudeau’s managers, as they prepare to launch the project.

Australia was leading the way in pointlessly brutal lockdowns and quarantines, when almost no citizens were allowed to fly into or out of the country. It was an experiment in how far they could push the people. Canada has now leapfrogged that role.

“Reimagining economic systems" — what does that mean other than revolution. As for the desire to “accelerate” the process, that’s the revolutionary vangbuard. But it ain’t the proletariat in the caboose.

How will poverty be addressed. Why the prefix “extreme” poverty? Superfluous again. So if we exclude the prefixes the rest of the sentance reads (extreme) poverty, meaning your poor, will be rationalised by (in)equality and (climate) change.

In other words poverty will be extinguished in relative terms by imposing equity and (since measures to address climate are taxation and subidies) by economic change.

That is communism.

So why did we talk earlier about fascism? Look at Trudeau’s words once again (he is a pupil of Klaus Schwab, remember).

“Reimagining economic systems that actually address global challenges like extreme poverty…”

Take that phrase, “extreme poverty” and substitute rich for poor. Does the challenge of a reimagined economic system also concern the extreme rich? What provision are they making in this economic transition? Remember that Event Covid is a monetary event. It was triggered by, or coincided with, the bill falling due for the 2008 bank bailout.

To protect the extreme rich, their corporations and assets, there will have to be a parallel system, an Übermensch and a poverty class. The state will protect the corporations or, more logically, the corporations will control the state.

That is fascism.

So how did fascism and communism come to be combined in one system to rule them all?

Recall that according to prof Antony Sutton of Stanford University, some of the same banking and commercial interests were behind the financing of Bolshevism and Nazism, and they aided China, too. If one wanted to conduct the ultimate live trial of economic systems, they were it. What have we learned of the authoritarian systems:

Fascism is better for private business and ownership rights. It produced the German economic miracle, to which you could add Japan, too.
Communism is better at repressing the people. If your agenda is depopulation, China and the Soviet Union proved far more effective at internal repression and genocide.

The evidence is incontrovertible: Germany and Japan vs China and the Soviet Union. All projects were supported by, if not initiated, by the same banking and corporate interests.

It was just an economic experiment. A pick and mix for psychopaths at the candy store. An “all you can eat” buffet for the extremely rich Hannibal Lecters.

No more fascist communists

Yet it is time to abandon the argument of whether we confront fascism or communism and leave that to the fanbois.

The UN, and World Bank would not sign up to that label anyway — it makes for an easy denial, even if it is largely accurate. We must show that liberal technocracy is unacceptable, whatever woke or progressive words they use to dress it up.

The proffered convenience of online services does not justify the handing of power to surveil and determine every aspect of our lives.

This includes your DNA, so bureaucrats with a command to reduce spending can weigh the costs of keeping you alive, against your worth to society — eugenics and euthanasia affects you personally.

Someone may calculate your value to the community. Look at how public-private partnership is working out in Britain’s National Health Service. Regard the telemedicine and Midazolam murders.

”We are all in this together.”

Moneycircus