3 Crises - Globalists Scheme, Prosecute Bhakdi, BBC Verifies

From food and energy to climate: censorship rises as centralizers double down

• Humanitarian and prof Sucharit Bhakdi arraigned under German hypocrisy laws

• ‘Hate speech’ would target you for having a link, book or document they don’t like

• Illogical policies require dictatorial thought control: heil BBC Verisimilitude

• Climate and Covid response conceal role as Trojan horse for social engineering

• From Dutch farmers, American food producers, Ukraine’s grain to Russian gas

• Only so many policies can fail at once, without malice aforethought

• We need environmentalist allies to recognise we’re co-opted by technocrats

• Their objective is not to ‘save’ anything; it is dialectical bullying

• Government failings over recycling and energy are by design, Greta!

(About 2,700 words or 13 minutes of your company)
See also BBC Flirts With 'Deeper Authority' (Moneycircus, Aug 18, 2021)

May 23, 2023

Hold these ideas in your mind simultaneously:

• New research shows that production of lab grown meat (fake meat) emits four to 25 times more carbon than natural meat.

• Mayor aims to impose caps to limit the amount of meat that New Yorkers can eat publicly — and eventually at home.

• EU approves Dutch government plan to forcibly evict farmers.

• EU has already adopted a resolution adding crickets, locusts and meal worms to the human food chain “in a bid to tackle climate change and the food crisis.” (for sources see below).

Or consider the absentee landlord energy policy that shuts down current output before putting replacement capacity in place. See Not Enough Minerals For Green Energy (Moneycircus, Sep 8, 2022).

The plans don’t seem logical. Why shut down farms if there is a shortage of food?
Why impose restrictions on nitrogen and methane from cows, if lab grown meat entails more energy use and pollution? Why limit meat consumption if it is not the problem?

Because meat is being narrated into a problem — spun in a web of lies like energy — and that requires armies of censors, posing as fact checkers, who answer to those who manipulate policy: the EU and the governments, the corporations, private foundations, hedge funds and asset managers, oilers and bankers.

Lidl launches insect patties, using soy and meal worm larvae, as part of the My Street Food range. Why not lick the pavement?

The EU approved house crickets, yellow meal worms and grasshoppers in frozen or powdered form that do not have to be labeled as such so long as they appear somewhere in the ingredients list.

President Biden’s climate czar John Kerry Declares War on US Farmers: Gov’t Farm Confiscations ‘Not Off The Table’ blares a headline.

Climate horse

The link between censorship and propaganda is central to the climate debate in order to conceal its role as the Trojan horse for a massive social engineering project, involving population control, surveillance and technology, rationing of resources, reimagining food, swapping cash and the workplace for new life systems, which measure people’s inputs and outputs according to new ethical values that negate former freedoms. [1]

The Green movement could gain political power in a somewhat pluralistic political system only while their proposed policies were not actually being implemented and before the implementation of renewables exposed the lack of a transition plan.

The population could be urged to separate garbage, tie paper into bundles, wash plastic bottles and bag aluminium cans.

People quietly forgot that in Britain, for example, until recent decades glass milk bottles had always been recycled when delivered by the milkman — many of the milk floats were electric so that they were near-silent on the morning round. Even the American pharmaceutical industry, when it introduced glass bottles, marketed them as re-usable. Electric cars outnumbered petrol cars in the U.S. 120 years ago. [2]

That does not mean those past success stories should be revived today, rather it warns us to be skeptical about any claims.

The need for tight control of political discourse changed once the Green policies began to be implemented. Until that point the popular debate could be partly self-policing: standards, whether of old-fashioned — “a stitch in time saves nine” — or standardised thought among those subjected to the narrative of schoolroom environmentalism was enough.

Censors’ imperative

Two things changed: illogical policy would be exposed for its damaging, nefarious effects; and governments would resort to compulsion, rendering Green policy totalitarian.

How can one be sure? Because the illogical policy is the means, not the objective.
For more on the insufficienly-examined wilds of the Green agenda be sure to catch the next newsletter.

Once it was revealed that most household recycling is a scam, cargo-shipped to other countries to be dumped or burned, any outrage had to be contained.

Only when coal and oil were curtailed, and in countries like Germany nuclear was canceled, did the inadequacy of solar and wind replacements become clear and energy bills inevitably began to soar.

Suddenly governments required the equivalent of “traffic calming” they use to ensure compliance on the road… speed bumps, surveillance, obstructions, delays.

Governments cannot implement illogical policy without a heavy hand on public discourse. So there had to be a series of scandals to impose censorship on the press and social media.

In the U.S. it began in the press with the unrelated “Satanic panic” of ritual child abuse — ignoring the fact that if you strip out the ritual, the abuse is very real. In the UK it was the “phone hacking” scandal, centred around a murdered girl Milly Dowler — ignoring the fact that this central plank of the hacking scandal never happened: her phone was not hacked. Britain’s most investigative newspaper, and the world’s oldest paper in continuous publication, The News Of The World, was shuttered by Rupert Murdoch who has just bowed down to his financiers again and decimated Fox News.

If the public were free to communicate, not just express, its outrage — on any topic — the recycling scam would have been more likely to be exposed, and with it the social compliance and programming that underpins Green policy.

Hoax is not too-strong a word. Pollution is a real problem but it is obscured by the questionable computer modeling of climate change. Over-production and planned obsolescence, such as mobile phones and laptops where you cannot even change the battery, are far more practical to address yet ignored. The poisoning of water, land and food is an issue, but one from which big agriculture and food processors make money.

That is why debate is controlled and directed: misdirection, not mis- or disinformation, is the key.

Lords of misrule

One would think cognitive dissonance would win out: the U.S. attorney Todd Callender who heads a large team of researchers estimates that a billion people may have been injured by the shot.

Then there is 5G which does not offer significantly faster internet speeds; so people should be asking what it is for. [3]

The migration crisis is too big, too orchestrated, for most to ignore. Yet the partisan do.

Chaos is mounting: the dispossession of farmers, the burning of farms and food processors, the dioxin spill in Ohio, the disruption to food and energy supplies, rising prices, the dismantling of public services, above all health care. [4]

You might think people would notice but they were knocked off balance. Worse is yet to come.

Bring on the clowns

When policies are illogical, the people cannot be allowed to think straight or rationalise — for the house of cards would collapse.

The “conspiracy theorist” meme has been perfected by linking issues which have no inherent nor scientific linkage — as if they are tenets of a credo. If you question any one of them, you are deemed a heretic who has rejected a belief system.

This is the means by which writers and journalists or anyone who dares voice an opinion is deemed one of us or them.

Naomi Klein, who made her name with Shock Doctrine (2006) but now sits on a Rockefeller-funded foundation, has written a book about “conspiracy theory culture.” Her new work, Doppelgaenger, due out this autumn, focuses on here obsession about being confused with Naomi Wolf.

Prof Sucharit Bhakdi is being prosecuted in Germany under “hate speech” for having compared the toll of the Covid response to the Holocaust and questioning how those who regret the former could perpetrate the latter.

Even the law being used to silence Prof Sucharit Bhakdi is illogical: what is the point of the injunction, “never again,” if the moment someone warns of a repetition — they risk prosecution!

Now you see why the BBC has just launched “BBC Verify” — which one should dismiss as Verisimilitude for it serves the goal of thought control.

Expressing an opinion is not the only pitfall. Under Ireland’s Incitement to Violence or Hatred and Hate Crimes Bill 2022, merely possessing material is an offence if censors determine you planned to share it. Scotland has something similar. England is soon to follow.

Prof Bhakdi’s impending prosecution only shouts his question more loudly: who is doing this?

Sociologists will probably tell us that this is an organic development of late-stage capitalism or some such guff: like the old comedy routine, “It’s a fair cop; society’s to blame.”

Great Reset Is complete

Author Bert Oliver echoes our Nov 2021 article, arguing for a cinematic attempt to capture “in retrospect… the currently unfolding attempt, by what one might arguably call a bunch of megalomaniacal psychopaths, to bring about a putative ‘great reset’.” [5]

It is great to see another voice pursuing this approach.

There are points of difference with the Oliver article: a skewed sequence in our view does not necessarily force viewers to challenge their own perception. It may just be a poorly-edited sequence, like that sea-sick hand-held “camerawork” of two decades ago.

The crystal, time-image is arguably another way of discussing perspective. As a photographer and historian this author claims no great insight because it is fundamentally unavoidable. Without grappling with perspective you miss the strengths of photography and you learn less from history.

See The Great Reset Is Complete: A future retrospective (Moneycircus, Nov 23, 2021)

“Deleuze argues that the split between these two images — the actual and its ‘other’, the virtual — reveals the hidden fault-lines of time in the perfect crystal, which means that even images of perfection are subject to the persistence of time (and therefore change), which is always already split.”

Compare Chekhov: The tension between the world as it should be, and the world as it is.

Historical perspective is the use of history as a lens to examine the present. Thus it is wholly different to seeing history as a tale of the past.

Interestingly the author, Mr Oliver, quotes Professor Kees van der Pijl, the former head of Sussex University international relations department, whom we encountered in a recent story of censorship. He shared an article entitled “9-11 / Israel did it” posted on Wikispooks. Van der Pijl tweet was posted on November 3 and read: “Not Saudis, Israelis blew up Twin Towers with help from Zionists in US gov.”

A Church of England vicar Dr Stephen Sizer shared the same article in 2015. The Archbishop of Canterbury barred him from ministry for 12 years for antisemitism.

The Board of Deputies of British Jews made 11 allegations against Dr Sizer, which claimed his conduct in incidents between 2005 and 2018 amounted to antisemitic activity. [6]

Essential polarisation

We recently saw the conclusion of the Durham report into the FBI and Russiagate: the media united in claiming it found “no deep state plot.”

The central myth of Trump-Russia must be maintained, for it helps discipline the media in line with the military censors and their private sector cutouts, and the whole concept of disinformation, “bad actors,” and the “hate speech” legislation aka censorship that follows.

This in turn allows consent to be manufactured for wars, from Yugoslavia and Iraq to Afghanistan, Syria and Libya to Ukraine, while eyes on the Middle East are misdirected, away from Palestine to Iran. It also allows patently unpopular and irrational policies to be pushed through, from vaccine mandates to Green energy (feel free to comment in favour of them; but energy prices and booster take-up do not imply popularity).

A John Pilger article, his last before The Guardian effectively fired him in 2014, is prescient: the U.S. military was already supplying Ukraine. [7]

“Ukraine has been turned into a CIA theme park — run personally by CIA director John Brennan in Kiev, with dozens of ‘special units’ from the CIA and FBI setting up a ‘security structure’ that oversees savage attacks on those who opposed the February coup....

“Russian-speaking Ukrainians are fighting for survival. When Putin announced the withdrawal of Russian troops from the border, the Kiev junta’s defence secretary, Andriy Parubiy — a founding member of the fascist Svoboda party — boasted that attacks on ‘insurgents’ would continue.”

He also quotes Heinz Kissinger: “It is not a matter of what is true that counts, but what is perceived to be true.”

In the eight years following Pilger’s article, 14,000 Russian-speaking Ukrainians would be killed, according to United Nations statistics, before Russia finally intervened.

Former deputy secretary of state Strobe Talbot, a Russiagate delusionist but nonetheless one of the U.S.' foremost diplomats made two revealing statements:

“It was Yugoslavia's resistance to the broader trends of political and economic reform — not the plight of Kosovar Albanians — that best explains NATO’s war.”

Yugoslavia was a successful multi-ethnic state that had stood, self-sufficient, in the face of the Soviet Union.

It ploughed a middle way between state-planning and a liberal economy. It had a thriving machine industry, made cars and motorbikes, and was one of the most popular tourist destinations. The West should have loved it.

Yet what you might call socialist cooperation on a non-centralised model was considered a threat by the globalists.

The Yugoslav system that had co-existed as part of the non-aligned bloc yet refusing to be directed by the Soviet Union was somehow anathema to the very Western neoliberals who claimed to oppose the USSR!

The reasoning comes in the next quote:

“In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn’t such a great idea after all.”

Yugoslavia had to be seen to fail because it disrupted the false narrative of central planning on the left, and free markets on the right. This was to act as a dialectic, guiding the population as a hockey puck.

The objective is, strange as it may seem, a world that is failing to develop energy supplies; limiting food production; increasing intrusion by the state into privacy; reducing private wealth and ownership through tax and seizure in lie of old age care; preparing for a one-world currency system that would enable granular control down to the rationing for each person of food, energy and activity.

This will be neither Moscow nor Washington DC; not Oceania, Eurasia nor Eastasia as in Nineteen Eighty-Four.

It will be Kallipolis, the Utopian city-state ruled by elders or guardians, as presented by Socrates in Plato's dialogue, The Republic.

[1] Euthanasia, depopulation and displacement; cybernetics and technocracy; behavioural manipulation, central bank digital currency, universal basic income, Gaia, Maitreya, UNESCO.

[2] The Guardian, Aug 2021 — The lost history of the electric car – and what it tells us about the future of transport

[3] Digital Trends, Apr 2022 — Is 5G as fast as they’re saying? We break down the speeds

[4] Supply Mgmt News, Jan 2023 — Record jump in factory fires will have 'ripple effect' on entire supply chain

[5] Bert Oliver, Real Left, May 20, 2023 — A Cinematic Model for a Retrospective Film on the Present Drive towards totalitarian power

[6] The Guardian, Jan 2023 — C of E vicar who shared claims 9/11 was Israeli plot barred for antisemitism

[7] John Pilger, The Guardian, 2014 — In Ukraine, the US is dragging us towards war with Russia